Helen plans to rob a bank - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 17 - 2002 - Paper 1
Question 17
Helen plans to rob a bank. She needs someone to drive a get-away car. Helen calls Tom and threatens that if he does not drive the car she will stop supplying him wit... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Helen plans to rob a bank - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 17 - 2002 - Paper 1
Step 1
Explain the difference between summary and indictable offences, illustrating your answer with examples from the above scenario.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Summary offences are less serious crimes that are usually tried in lower courts and carry lighter penalties. For example, Tom running through two red traffic lights could be considered a summary offence.
Indictable offences are more serious crimes that require a trial by jury and can result in severe penalties. Helen's actions of robbery and killing the security guard fall under indictable offences due to their seriousness.
Step 2
(b) Define the following three elements of a crime and, with reference to the above scenario, provide an example of each element: (i) mens rea;
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Mens rea refers to the mental state or intent of the individual when committing a crime. In this scenario, Helen demonstrates mens rea by planning the robbery and threatening Tom to ensure he is the getaway driver.
Step 3
(ii) actus reus;
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Actus reus is the actual physical act of committing the crime. In this case, the actus reus would be Helen entering the bank with a stolen gun and shooting the security guard.
Step 4
(iii) causation.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Causation establishes that the act committed led to the result. Helen's act of shooting the security guard directly caused his death, linking her actions to the outcome.
Step 5
(c) If you had to defend Helen and Tom in court, what possible defence(s) to the charge of murder would you use for Helen, and what possible defence(s) would you use for any charges faced by Tom? Justify the use of these defences.
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
For Helen, a potential defence could be self-defence if it can be argued that she felt threatened by the security guard who was chasing her. For Tom, the defence might be necessity, claiming he acted under duress because Helen threatened him with loss of illegal supplies if he did not comply.
Step 6
(d) Discuss the purpose and effectiveness of possible punishments the judge could consider before sentencing Helen and Tom.
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The purpose of punishment could include deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution. Effective sentences might involve prison time for Helen due to the seriousness of her actions, while Tom might receive a lighter sentence if his role was proven to be coerced. Options could include community service or probation for lesser offences, emphasizing the need for rehabilitation.