Photo AI

Which of the following is legally bound by a precedent set by the High Court in a matter of NSW criminal law? (A) The NSW Parliament (B) The Australian Parliament (C) A foreign national living in NSW (D) A NSW resident on holiday in Tasmania - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 7 - 2006 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 7

Which-of-the-following-is-legally-bound-by-a-precedent-set-by-the-High-Court-in-a-matter-of-NSW-criminal-law?--(A)-The-NSW-Parliament--(B)-The-Australian-Parliament--(C)-A-foreign-national-living-in-NSW--(D)-A-NSW-resident-on-holiday-in-Tasmania-HSC-SSCE Legal Studies-Question 7-2006-Paper 1.png

Which of the following is legally bound by a precedent set by the High Court in a matter of NSW criminal law? (A) The NSW Parliament (B) The Australian Parliament ... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Which of the following is legally bound by a precedent set by the High Court in a matter of NSW criminal law? (A) The NSW Parliament (B) The Australian Parliament (C) A foreign national living in NSW (D) A NSW resident on holiday in Tasmania - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 7 - 2006 - Paper 1

Step 1

C) A foreign national living in NSW

96%

114 rated

Answer

In the context of NSW criminal law, precedents set by the High Court are binding on lower courts in New South Wales. This means that any person who is subject to the laws of New South Wales, including a foreign national living in the state, is bound by those precedents. Therefore, option (C) is correct as it reflects the principle that any individual residing in NSW must adhere to the state's laws, which are based on precedents set by the High Court.

Join the SSCE students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;