Evidence recorded by a camera shows a person committing a crime - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 12 - 2016 - Paper 1
Question 12
Evidence recorded by a camera shows a person committing a crime. At the court hearing, the prosecution does not have to prove the person’s intention to commit the cr... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Evidence recorded by a camera shows a person committing a crime - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 12 - 2016 - Paper 1
Step 1
For which crime was this person charged?
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
In this scenario, the key detail is that the prosecution does not need to prove the person's intention to commit the crime. This suggests that the crime in question is one that is judged based on the act itself rather than the intent behind it.
Analysis of Each Option
Assaulting a stranger (A): This crime typically requires intention, as assault implies an intent to harm.
Speeding in a school zone (B): This is generally an offense that does not require intention to be proven as it is an infraction based merely on the act of speeding.
Stealing money from an employer (C): Theft usually involves intention, as it requires the intent to permanently deprive someone of their property.
Planning to break into a neighbour’s house (D): Planning implies intention, making it unlikely as a charge where intent is not proven.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the crime for which the person was charged, where intention does not need to be proven, is most likely (B) Speeding in a school zone.