'Legal responses are more effective than non-legal responses in achieving justice.' To what extent is this statement true in relation to world order? - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 32 - 2022 - Paper 1

The effectiveness of legal responses in achieving justice within the context of world order can be assessed through various lenses such as international law, treaties, and judicial systems.

Legal Responses

Legal mechanisms, such as international treaties and conventions, play a crucial role in establishing norms and standards for behavior among states. For example, the United Nations Charter provides a legal framework that promotes peace and security across nations. These legal responses facilitate cooperation among countries, ensuring that there are accountability measures for breaches of international law.

Effectiveness of Non-Legal Responses

Conversely, non-legal responses, such as diplomatic negotiations or grassroots movements, also contribute to achieving justice. These approaches can mobilize public opinion and create pressure on governments to act in compliance with international norms. For instance, advocacy campaigns often lead to significant changes, despite lacking formal legal status.

Comparative Analysis

While legal responses provide a formal structure for accountability, they may sometimes lack the immediacy or flexibility that non-legal responses offer. The effectiveness of these responses largely depends on the willingness of states to adhere to legal frameworks. Evidence points to instances where legal mandates were ignored, undermining their utility in achieving justice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the statement holds validity in many cases where legal frameworks provide an indispensable foundation for achieving justice. However, the interplay between legal and non-legal responses reveals that both are essential in addressing complex world order issues.