Why are non-legal measures often more effective than legal measures in addressing human rights issues? (A) Because of the operation of state sovereignty (B) Because collective human rights override individual human rights (C) Because non-legal measures can always be adapted to individual circumstances (D) Because non-legal measures can bypass government processes and bureaucracies - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 9 - 2004 - Paper 1

Non-legal measures are often more effective than legal measures in addressing human rights issues primarily because they can bypass complex government processes and bureaucracies. Legal frameworks frequently involve lengthy procedures, strict regulations, and may be hindered by political interests or corruption, which can delay or prevent effective action.

In contrast, non-legal measures, such as grassroots activism, public awareness campaigns, and community initiatives, allow for immediate responsiveness to human rights violations. These measures can mobilize public opinion and generate support for victims without the need for formal legal action, thus making them a more fluid and adaptable approach to addressing urgent human rights concerns.