Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 8 - 2018 - Paper 1
Question 8
Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery.
Which of the following would have led to this finding?
A. Mary supplied the gun that was used.
B... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 8 - 2018 - Paper 1
Step 1
A. Mary supplied the gun that was used.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Supplying the gun would indicate that Mary played a crucial role in enabling the crime, thus making her an accessory before the fact since she provided the means to commit the robbery.
Step 2
B. Mary used the gun at the crime scene.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using the gun at the crime scene suggests active participation in the robbery rather than merely being an accessory before the fact.
Step 3
C. Mary carried the money out of the bank.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Carrying the money out demonstrates direct involvement in the robbery, placing her beyond the role of an accessory before the fact.
Step 4
D. Mary hid the money taken from the bank.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Hiding the money would imply knowledge of the crime but indicates a response rather than involvement before the crime, hence does not lead to her being classified as an accessory before the fact.
