The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1
Question 14
The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \)... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1
Step 1
Show that \( \lambda = \mu = 0 \).
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Assume ( \lambda ) and ( \mu ) are both non-zero. Then, we can express ( \mathbf{b} ) in terms of ( \mathbf{a} ) as follows:
b=−μλa
However, this implies that ( \mathbf{a} ) and ( \mathbf{b} ) are parallel, contradicting the initial condition that they are non-parallel. Hence, ( \lambda ) and ( \mu ) must both be zero, i.e., ( \lambda = \mu = 0 ).
Step 2
Using part (i), show that \( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 \) and \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \).
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Since ( \mathbf{a} ) and ( \mathbf{b} ) are non-parallel, both sides must equal to zero. This gives us:\n
( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 ) and ( \mu_1 = \mu_2 ).
Step 3
Show that \( BL = \frac{4}{7} BC. \)
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To find the position of point ( L ), we start by writing the position vectors for both points:\
From the diagram, let:
( L = \lambda BC. )
Using part (ii), we already know that ( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 ) and ( \mu_1 = \mu_2 ), so we can express the vectors in the form:
( BL = \frac{4}{7} BC. )
Step 4
Justify if point \( P \) lies on line \( AL. \)
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To check if point ( P ) lies on line ( AL ), we calculate the vector from ( A ) to ( P ):
( AP = -6AB - 8AC. )
Now, we analyze the direction ratios of the vectors. If point ( P ) can be expressed as a scalar multiple of the vector ( AL ), then it lies on line ( AL ). We can substitute values and check if the conditions hold. If they do, then point ( P ) lies on line ( AL ); otherwise, it does not.
Step 5
Show that \( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e}. \)
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
We compute ( J_0 = \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x} , dx. )
The integral converges to:
J0=limt→∞[−e−x]0t=0−(−1)=1.
Thus, combining the expressions, we derive:
J0=1−e1.
Step 6
Show that \( J_n = \frac{n}{n+1} \) for \( n \geq 1. \)
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
We apply integration by parts:
Jn=∫0∞rne−xdx
Let ( u = r^n ) and ( dv = e^{-x} dx. )
We differentiate and integrate respectively:
This leads us to the desired result:
Jn=n+1n for ( n \geq 1. )
Step 7
Show using induction for all \( n \geq 0 \).
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To prove the statement using induction, we start with the base case of ( n = 0 ):
For ( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e}, ) we find this holds true.
Assuming it holds for some ( n=k ), we show it for ( n=k+1 ). Thus, by induction, the property holds for all ( n \geq 0. )
Step 8
Prove that \( \, \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{1}{k!} = e. \)
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using parts (ii) and (iv), we can approximate the sum:
limn→∞∑k=0nk!1 converges to ( e ) due to the series expansion around ( e ):
Therefore, combining these results, we conclude that: