Photo AI

The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 14

The-two-non-parallel-vectors-\(-\mathbf{a}-\)-and-\(-\mathbf{b}-\)-satisfy-\(-\lambda-\mathbf{a}-+-\mu-\mathbf{b}-=-\mathbf{0}-\)-for-some-real-numbers-\(-\lambda-\)-and-\(-\mu-\)-HSC-SSCE Mathematics Extension 2-Question 14-2022-Paper 1.png

The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \)... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1

Step 1

Show that \( \lambda = \mu = 0 \).

96%

114 rated

Answer

Assume ( \lambda ) and ( \mu ) are both non-zero. Then, we can express ( \mathbf{b} ) in terms of ( \mathbf{a} ) as follows:

b=λμa\mathbf{b} = -\frac{\lambda}{\mu} \mathbf{a}

However, this implies that ( \mathbf{a} ) and ( \mathbf{b} ) are parallel, contradicting the initial condition that they are non-parallel. Hence, ( \lambda ) and ( \mu ) must both be zero, i.e., ( \lambda = \mu = 0 ).

Step 2

Using part (i), show that \( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 \) and \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \).

99%

104 rated

Answer

Given the equations from part (i):

( \lambda_1 \mathbf{a} + \mu_1 \mathbf{b} = \lambda_2 \mathbf{a} + \mu_2 \mathbf{b} )

We can rearrange this to:

( \lambda_1 , \mathbf{a} - \lambda_2 , \mathbf{a} = (\mu_2 - \mu_1) \mathbf{b} )

Since ( \mathbf{a} ) and ( \mathbf{b} ) are non-parallel, both sides must equal to zero. This gives us:\n ( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 ) and ( \mu_1 = \mu_2 ).

Step 3

Show that \( BL = \frac{4}{7} BC. \)

96%

101 rated

Answer

To find the position of point ( L ), we start by writing the position vectors for both points:\

From the diagram, let:

( L = \lambda BC. )

Using part (ii), we already know that ( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 ) and ( \mu_1 = \mu_2 ), so we can express the vectors in the form:

( BL = \frac{4}{7} BC. )

Step 4

Justify if point \( P \) lies on line \( AL. \)

98%

120 rated

Answer

To check if point ( P ) lies on line ( AL ), we calculate the vector from ( A ) to ( P ):

( AP = -6AB - 8AC. )

Now, we analyze the direction ratios of the vectors. If point ( P ) can be expressed as a scalar multiple of the vector ( AL ), then it lies on line ( AL ). We can substitute values and check if the conditions hold. If they do, then point ( P ) lies on line ( AL ); otherwise, it does not.

Step 5

Show that \( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e}. \)

97%

117 rated

Answer

We compute ( J_0 = \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x} , dx. )

The integral converges to:

J0=limt[ex]0t=0(1)=1.J_0 = \lim_{t \to \infty} [-e^{-x}]_0^{t} = 0 - (-1) = 1.

Thus, combining the expressions, we derive:

J0=11e.J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e}.

Step 6

Show that \( J_n = \frac{n}{n+1} \) for \( n \geq 1. \)

97%

121 rated

Answer

We apply integration by parts:

Jn=0rnexdxJ_n = \int_0^{\infty} r^n e^{-x} \, dx

Let ( u = r^n ) and ( dv = e^{-x} dx. )

We differentiate and integrate respectively:

This leads us to the desired result:

Jn=nn+1J_n = \frac{n}{n+1} for ( n \geq 1. )

Step 7

Show using induction for all \( n \geq 0 \).

96%

114 rated

Answer

To prove the statement using induction, we start with the base case of ( n = 0 ):

For ( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e}, ) we find this holds true.

Assuming it holds for some ( n=k ), we show it for ( n=k+1 ). Thus, by induction, the property holds for all ( n \geq 0. )

Step 8

Prove that \( \, \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{1}{k!} = e. \)

99%

104 rated

Answer

Using parts (ii) and (iv), we can approximate the sum:

limnk=0n1k!\lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{1}{k!} converges to ( e ) due to the series expansion around ( e ):

Therefore, combining these results, we conclude that:

e=limnk=0n1k!e = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{1}{k!}

Join the SSCE students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;