8. (a) Show that $2ab \leq c^2$ for all real numbers a and b - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 8 - 2001 - Paper 1
Question 8
8. (a) Show that $2ab \leq c^2$ for all real numbers a and b.
Hence deduce that $3(ab + bc + ca) \leq (a + b + c)^2$ for all real numbers a, b and c.
(ii) Suppose ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:8. (a) Show that $2ab \leq c^2$ for all real numbers a and b - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 8 - 2001 - Paper 1
Step 1
Show that $2ab \leq c^2$ for all real numbers a and b.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To prove this, we can rearrange the inequality: c2−2ab≥0.
Consider (c−a)2+(c−b)2: (c−a)2+(c−b)2=c2−2ac+a2+c2−2bc+b2=2c2−2ab.
Since squares of real numbers are always non-negative, we have (c−a)2+(c−b)2geq0,
which simplifies to c2−2abgeq0, hence proving that 2ab≤c2.
Step 2
Hence deduce that $3(ab + bc + ca) \leq (a + b + c)^2$ for all real numbers a, b and c.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using the previous result, we know that: (a+b+c)2=a2+b2+c2+2(ab+bc+ca).
To show that: 3(ab+bc+ca)≤(a+b+c)2,
we can rearrange to find: a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca≥0.
This can be proven using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
Step 3
Explain why $(b - c)^2 \leq a^2$.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using the triangle inequality for sides a, b, and c of a triangle, we have: ∣b−c∣≤a.
Hence squaring both sides gives us: (b−c)2≤a2.
Step 4
Deduce that $(a + b + c)^2 \leq 4(ab + bc + ca)$.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Combining the previous inequalities, we can deduce the following:
From (b−c)2≤a2, we deduce that: (b−c)2+(a−b)2+(c−a)2≤a2+b2+c2.
This gives us: 2(ab+ac+bc)≥(a+b+c)2,
thus resulting in: (a+b+c)2≤4(ab+bc+ca).
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using comparison or bounding methods, since ex<e3 for x<3, we can bound the expression: ∫01xαexdx<e3∫01xαdx.
Calculating the integral gives: ∫01xαdx=α+11.
Thus concluding that: ∫01xαexdx<α+13e3.
Step 6
Show, by induction, that for $n = 0, 1, 2, ...$, there exist integers $a_n$ and $b_n$ such that $\int_{0}^{1} x^{n}e^{x} dx = a_n + b_n$.
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Base case: for n=0, we have ∫01exdx=e−1=a0+b0.
Inductive step: assume true for n=k, then show for n=k+1: ∫01xk+1exdx=(k+1)!−∫01k!exdx,
leading to the same form for integers an and bn.
Step 7
Suppose that r is a positive rational, so that $r = \frac{p}{q}$ where p and q are positive integers.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
For integers a and b, consider cases: if ∣a+br∣=0, it holds.
If not, rewrite: ∣a+br∣=∣a+bqp∣=∣qaq+bp∣≥q∣aq+bp∣.
Hence the proof completes: either ∣a+br∣=0 or ∣a+br∣≥q∣a+br∣.
Step 8
Prove that $e$ is irrational.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Assume for contradiction that e is rational, i.e., e=qp.
Using Taylor series expansion of e: e=∑n=0∞n!1<3
and show a non-integer form emerges through factorial terms, leading to hypocrisy in the assumption of rationality, proving that e cannot be rational.