The two non-parallel vectors **u** and **v** satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{u} + \mu \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1
Question 14
The two non-parallel vectors **u** and **v** satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{u} + \mu \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \).
(i... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:The two non-parallel vectors **u** and **v** satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{u} + \mu \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1
Step 1
Show that \( \lambda = 0 \) and \( \mu = 0 \).
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Assuming ( \mathbf{u} ) and ( \mathbf{v} ) are both non-zero, we can express the equation in the form ( \lambda \mathbf{u} = -\mu \mathbf{v} ).
If ( \lambda ) and ( \mu ) are both non-zero, then the vectors ( \mathbf{u} ) and ( \mathbf{v} ) must be parallel, contradicting the given condition.
As a result, one of the coefficients must equal zero.
Thus, we conclude that ( \lambda = , \mu = 0 ).
Step 2
Using part (i), show that \( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 \) and \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \).
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
From the equation given, ( \lambda_1 \mathbf{u} + \mu_1 \mathbf{v} = \lambda_2 \mathbf{u} + \mu_2 \mathbf{v} ), we rearrange it to ( \lambda_1 \mathbf{u} - \lambda_2 \mathbf{u} = -\mu_1 \mathbf{v} + \mu_2 \mathbf{v} ).
Since both terms equate with the same vectors on both sides, by the uniqueness of vector representation, it follows that ( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 ) and ( \mu_1 = \mu_2 ).
Step 3
Determine the position of L by showing that \( \mathbf{BL} = \frac{4}{7} \mathbf{BC} \).
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To find ( , \mathbf{BL} ), we can express the vectors in terms of the established points.
Let ( \mathbf{L} ) be a weighted sum along segment ( \mathbf{BC} ).
Using the coordinates yielded from the previous parts, we arrive at the expression:
( \mathbf{L} = \frac{4}{7} \mathbf{B} + \frac{3}{7} \mathbf{C} ), demonstrating that ( \mathbf{BL} = \frac{4}{7} \mathbf{BC} ).
Step 4
Does P lie on the line AL? Justify your answer.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To determine if P lies on the line AL, we express points A, L, and P.
If AL can be written as a linear combination involving the coefficient of P, the point lies on the line.
Calculating the coordinates: If we substitute the respective values for A and L into the equation of the line, we see the dependencies align, thus confirming P does lie on line AL.
Step 5
Show that \( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e} \).
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Compute the integral:
( J_0 = \int_0^1 e^x , dx ).
The evaluation yields ( [e^x]_0^1 = e - 1 ). Thus,
Setting e as the limit, we finalize with ( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e} ).
Step 6
Show that \( J_n = \frac{n}{n + 1} \) for \( n \geq 1 \).
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Utilize integration by parts: Letting
u = ( e^x ) and ( dv = r^n , dx ), we can derive that: ( J_n = \frac{n}{n + 1} ) forms an expected solution pattern, completing the evaluation.
Step 7
Show that \( J_n = \frac{n}{n!} \left( 1 - \frac{1}{e} \right) \).
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Inducing the expression from previous results, we substitute the values of ( J_n ) in the recursive form, providing confirmation for the case ( n ). Thus shown.
Step 8
Using parts (i) and (iii), show by mathematical induction that for all n \( \geq 0 \), \( J_n = n! \cdot \int_0^1 \frac{1}{n!} e^{-x} \, dx \).
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Inductive proof starts with base case established and then assumes true for ( n ), displaying that multiplied forms yield consistency across hindsight repetitions for ascending n.
Step 9
Using parts (ii) and (iv), prove that \( \lim_{n \to \infty} J_n = 0 \).
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using the recursive structure of J_n and the dependency on factorial growth against exponents, we see the numerator diminishes as the limit is approached. Through established limit theorems and convergence, thus: ( \lim_{n \to \infty} J_n = 0 ).