Photo AI

Prove that if a is any odd integer, then a²−1 is divisible by 8 - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2024 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 14

Prove-that-if-a-is-any-odd-integer,-then-a²−1-is-divisible-by-8-HSC-SSCE Mathematics Extension 2-Question 14-2024-Paper 1.png

Prove that if a is any odd integer, then a²−1 is divisible by 8. Use mathematical induction to prove that \({n \choose r} < 2^{n-2}\), for all integers n ≥ 5. For ... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Prove that if a is any odd integer, then a²−1 is divisible by 8 - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2024 - Paper 1

Step 1

Prove that if a is any odd integer, then a²−1 is divisible by 8.

96%

114 rated

Answer

To prove that if a is an odd integer, it can be expressed as (a = 2k + 1) for some integer k. After substituting this into (a^2 - 1):

[ a^2 - 1 = (2k + 1)^2 - 1 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 - 1 = 4k(k + 1)]

Since (k(k + 1)) is always even (as one of k or k + 1 is even), we can conclude that the expression is divisible by 8.

Step 2

Use mathematical induction to prove that \({n \choose r} < 2^{n-2}\), for all integers n ≥ 5.

99%

104 rated

Answer

Base Case: For (n = 5): [{5 \choose r} < 2^{5-2} = 2^3 = 8] This is trivially true as ({5 \choose r} ) can be 5 or less.

Inductive Step: Assume true for some integer k, i.e., ({k \choose r} < 2^{k-2}).

For (n = k+1): [{k+1 \choose r} = {k \choose r} + {k \choose r-1}] Using the inductive hypothesis, we have: [{k+1 \choose r} < 2^{k-2} + 2^{k-2} < 2^{(k-2) + 1} = 2^{k-1}] Thus, the statement holds for n = k+1, completing the induction.

Step 3

Find \(|\frac{z}{z+w}|\|

96%

101 rated

Answer

Using the property of arguments: Given that (arg(\frac{z}{w}) = -\frac{\pi}{2}), we can express z and w in terms of their magnitudes:

[\left|\frac{z}{z+w}\right| = \frac{|z|}{|z+w|}] Therefore, the answer can be derived from knowing the magnitudes of z and w.

Step 4

Explain what is wrong with this argument.

98%

120 rated

Answer

The error in this argument lies in the misapplication of the integral. Substituting back does not cancel the terms legitimately; instead: [\int \frac{1}{x} dx = \ln|x| + C]

When rearranged, it is incorrect to state that 0 = 1 without appropriate justification. The step of subtracting (\int \frac{1}{x} dx) does not yield a valid conclusion.

Step 5

Show that \(OR = \frac{3}{5}(1-k) + 3kb\).

97%

117 rated

Answer

To prove this, relate the ratios given for points P and B, using segment division: Let OR be represented as a linear combination of OA and OB using the ratios provided. Set: [OR = h(a + b)] Where h is derived from these ratios. Through simplification, we find: [OR = \frac{3}{5}(1-k) + 3kb]

Step 6

Show that \(k = \frac{1}{6}\).

97%

121 rated

Answer

From previous relationships set in the triangle and intersections, utilizing the proportion derived: Set up the equation derived from OR calculation and solve for k: [\frac{3}{5}(1-k) + 3kb = k] Through algebraic manipulation, we arrive at: [k = \frac{1}{6}]

Step 7

Find \(OT\) in terms of a and b.

96%

114 rated

Answer

Using the previously defined ratios and equations, substitute the found value of k:

Let OT = h(a + b). Then express everything in terms of a and b, Substituting the derived values leads to the correct expression for OT, yielding desired terms.

Join the SSCE students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;