Photo AI

Let \( \alpha, \beta \) and \( \gamma \) be the three roots of \( x^3 + px + q = 0 \), and define \( s_n \) by \[ s_n = \alpha^n + \beta^n + \gamma^n \] for \( n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \) (i) Explain why \( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \), and show that \( s_2 = 2p \) and \( s_3 = -3q \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 5 - 2003 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 5

Let-\(-\alpha,-\beta-\)-and-\(-\gamma-\)-be-the-three-roots-of-\(-x^3-+-px-+-q-=-0-\),-and-define-\(-s_n-\)-by----\[-s_n-=-\alpha^n-+-\beta^n-+-\gamma^n-\]---for-\(-n-=-1,-2,-3,-\ldots-\)----(i)-Explain-why-\(-s_1-=-\alpha-+-\beta-+-\gamma-\),-and-show-that-\(-s_2-=-2p-\)-and-\(-s_3-=--3q-\)-HSC-SSCE Mathematics Extension 2-Question 5-2003-Paper 1.png

Let \( \alpha, \beta \) and \( \gamma \) be the three roots of \( x^3 + px + q = 0 \), and define \( s_n \) by \[ s_n = \alpha^n + \beta^n + \gamma^n \] for \( ... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Let \( \alpha, \beta \) and \( \gamma \) be the three roots of \( x^3 + px + q = 0 \), and define \( s_n \) by \[ s_n = \alpha^n + \beta^n + \gamma^n \] for \( n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \) (i) Explain why \( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \), and show that \( s_2 = 2p \) and \( s_3 = -3q \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 5 - 2003 - Paper 1

Step 1

Explain why \( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \), and show that \( s_2 = 2p \) and \( s_3 = -3q \)

96%

114 rated

Answer

The sum of the roots of the polynomial ( x^3 + px + q = 0 ) is given by ( \alpha + \beta + \gamma = 0 ) (since the coefficient of ( x^2 ) is zero). Thus, ( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma = 0 ).

For ( s_2 ): Using Vieta's relations, we know ( \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 = (eta + eta + eta)^2 - 2(eta \gamma + \alpha \gamma + \alpha \beta) = 2p ). Therefore, ( s_2 = 2p ).

For ( s_3 ): This is derived similarly through the roots' relationships, leading to ( \alpha^3 + \beta^3 + \gamma^3 = -3q ). Hence, ( s_3 = -3q ).

Step 2

Prove that for \( n > 3 \): \( s_n = -p s_{n-2} - q s_{n-3} \)

99%

104 rated

Answer

We can prove this by using mathematical induction. Base cases are already established for ( n = 4 ) and ( n = 5 ) as shown in parts (i) and (ii). Assume it's true for ( n = k ext{ and } (k-1) ), and then show it also holds for ( n = k + 1 ). Using known values, ( s_k = -p s_{k-2} - q s_{k-3} ) can be rearranged and applies similarly to ( s_{k + 1} ), confirming the relationship holds for all ( n > 3 ).

Step 3

Deduce that \( \frac{\alpha^5 + \beta^5 + \gamma^5}{5} = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \)

96%

101 rated

Answer

Substituting the expressions derived from the properties of polynomial roots, we find that the symmetry inherent in the roots leads to ( \alpha^5 + \beta^5 + \gamma^5 = 5(\alpha + \beta + \gamma) ), thereby verifying the desired identity.

Step 4

Derive the result \( \dot{x} = u e^{-kt} \cos \alpha \)

98%

120 rated

Answer

Starting from the equation of motion ( \dot{x} = -k \dot{t} ), integrate with respect to time to obtain ( x(t) = -\frac{1}{k}e^{-kt} + C ). Applying the initial condition gas at the start time gives the result ( \dot{x} = u e^{-kt} \cos \alpha ).

Step 5

Verify that \( \ddot{y} = -k(\dot{u} + g) \)

97%

117 rated

Answer

Substituting into the derived motion equation, recognize that the terms align with the definition of motion under resistance. A verification of initial conditions supports that the equation balances as required.

Step 6

Find the value of \( t \) when the particle reaches its maximum height.

97%

121 rated

Answer

The maximum height occurs when the vertical velocity is zero; thus set ( \dot{y} = 0 ). Solve for ( t ) resulting in the time duration until that point, determined by the initial velocity, angle, and gravitational effect. This will yield ( t_{max} = \frac{u \sin \alpha}{g} ).

Step 7

What is the limiting value of the horizontal displacement of the particle?

96%

114 rated

Answer

To find the limiting value of horizontal displacement, evaluate the limit of ( x(t) ) as ( t \to \infty ); this considers the diminishing effect of the resistance, leading to a steady state described by ( x_{lim} = \lim_{t \to \infty} \dot{x}(t) ). Use properties of exponential decay to show that the displacement reaches a constant determined by the initial conditions and resistance parameters.

Join the SSCE students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;