Photo AI
Statement 1: In the Wik decision, the High Court first recognised that the term terra nullius was not an appropriate description of the land - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 10 - 2018 - Paper 1
Question 10
Statement 1: In the Wik decision, the High Court first recognised that the term terra nullius was not an appropriate description of the land. Statement 2: The Bring... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Statement 1: In the Wik decision, the High Court first recognised that the term terra nullius was not an appropriate description of the land - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 10 - 2018 - Paper 1
Step 1
Statement 1: In the Wik decision, the High Court first recognised that the term terra nullius was not an appropriate description of the land.
Answer
This statement is true. The Wik decision, handed down in 1996 by the High Court of Australia, indeed recognized that terra nullius, a term that disregarded the existence of Aboriginal rights to land, was not an appropriate description of the land in question.
Step 2
Statement 2: The Bringing them Home report was the first legal recognition of Aboriginal native title.
Answer
This statement is false. Although the Bringing them Home report, released in 1997, highlighted the historical injustices faced by Aboriginal peoples and called for the legal recognition of their rights, it was not the first legal recognition of native title in Australia. The landmark case of Mabo v Queensland (No 2) in 1992 was the first to legally recognize native title.
Step 3