Photo AI

Figure 1 shows an incomplete Born–Haber cycle for the formation of caesium iodide - AQA - A-Level Chemistry - Question 1 - 2019 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 1

Figure-1-shows-an-incomplete-Born–Haber-cycle-for-the-formation-of-caesium-iodide-AQA-A-Level Chemistry-Question 1-2019-Paper 1.png

Figure 1 shows an incomplete Born–Haber cycle for the formation of caesium iodide. The diagram is not to scale. Cs(g) + ½I2(g) → CsI(s) Table 1 gives values of som... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Figure 1 shows an incomplete Born–Haber cycle for the formation of caesium iodide - AQA - A-Level Chemistry - Question 1 - 2019 - Paper 1

Step 1

Complete Figure 1 by writing the formulas, including state symbols, of the appropriate species on each of the two blank lines.

96%

114 rated

Answer

Top line: Cs(g) + ½I2(g)
Lower line: CsI(s)

Step 2

Use Figure 1 and the data in Table 1 to calculate the standard enthalpy of atomisation of iodine.

99%

104 rated

Answer

To find the standard enthalpy of atomisation of iodine, we can start by writing the enthalpy change equation for the given reaction:

Using the values from Table 1, we can substitute:

extΔH=79+376314585 ext{ΔH} = 79 + 376 - 314 - 585

Calculating gives us:

extΔH=79+376314585=434extkJmol1 ext{ΔH} = 79 + 376 - 314 - 585 = -434 ext{ kJ mol⁻¹}
Thus, the standard enthalpy of atomisation of iodine is 107extkJmol1107 ext{ kJ mol⁻¹}.

Step 3

Deduce what these values indicate about the bonding in caesium iodide.

96%

101 rated

Answer

The calculated standard enthalpy of atomisation of iodine (107extkJmol1107 ext{ kJ mol⁻¹}) is significantly lower than the experimental value found using the perfect ionic model, which is −582 kJ mol⁻¹. This suggests that the bonding in caesium iodide is predominantly ionic in character, but may also have some covalent character, indicating it isn't purely ionic.

Step 4

Use data from Table 2 to show that this reaction is not feasible at 298 K.

98%

120 rated

Answer

To determine if the reaction is feasible, we'll calculate the Gibbs free energy change (ΔGΔG) using the relation:

ΔG=ΔHTΔSΔG = ΔH - TΔS

From Table 2, calculate the entropy change:

ΔS=(82.8+117130)=69.8extJK1mol1ΔS = (82.8 + 117 - 130) = 69.8 ext{ J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹}

Converting entropy into kJ:

ΔS=0.0698extkJK1mol1ΔS = 0.0698 ext{ kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹}

Now using T=298KT = 298 K:

ΔG=337(298imes0.0698)ΔG = 337 - (298 imes 0.0698) ΔG=33720.8=316.2extkJmol1ΔG = 337 - 20.8 = 316.2 ext{ kJ mol⁻¹}

Since ΔG>0ΔG > 0, the reaction is not feasible at 298 K.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;