Photo AI

During the 2006 Christmas holiday, John, a maths teacher, realised that he had fallen ill during 65% of the Christmas holidays since he had started teaching - AQA - A-Level Maths Mechanics - Question 12 - 2019 - Paper 3

Question icon

Question 12

During-the-2006-Christmas-holiday,-John,-a-maths-teacher,-realised-that-he-had-fallen-ill-during-65%-of-the-Christmas-holidays-since-he-had-started-teaching-AQA-A-Level Maths Mechanics-Question 12-2019-Paper 3.png

During the 2006 Christmas holiday, John, a maths teacher, realised that he had fallen ill during 65% of the Christmas holidays since he had started teaching. In Jan... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:During the 2006 Christmas holiday, John, a maths teacher, realised that he had fallen ill during 65% of the Christmas holidays since he had started teaching - AQA - A-Level Maths Mechanics - Question 12 - 2019 - Paper 3

Step 1

State hypotheses for one-tailed test

96%

114 rated

Answer

Let the null hypothesis, H0H_0: The proportion of times John falls ill during Christmas holidays after increasing exercise, p=0.65p = 0.65.

Let the alternative hypothesis, HaH_a: The proportion of times John falls ill during Christmas holidays after increasing exercise, p<0.65p < 0.65.

Step 2

State model used (condone 0.009 rather than 0.05 PI)

99%

104 rated

Answer

We will use a binomial distribution with parameters:

  • n=7n = 7 (the number of Christmas holidays without illness since January 2007)
  • p=0.65p = 0.65 (the hypothesized probability of falling ill).

Step 3

Using calculator, 0.056 or better

96%

101 rated

Answer

We need to find P(X2)P(X \leq 2) where XX is the number of times he falls ill. Using a binomial calculator: P(X2)=k=02(7k)(0.65)k(0.35)7kP(X \leq 2) = \sum_{k=0}^{2} {7 \choose k} (0.65)^k (0.35)^{7-k} Evaluating this gives approximately 0.0556.

Step 4

Evaluate binomial model by comparing P(X ≤ 2) with 0.05 PI

98%

120 rated

Answer

Since P(X2)=0.0556P(X \leq 2) = 0.0556, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5

Infer H0 accepted PI

97%

117 rated

Answer

Based on our calculations, we accept the null hypothesis, indicating that there is not sufficient evidence to claim that John's rate of illness during the Christmas holidays has decreased since increasing his weekly exercise.

Step 6

Conclude correctly in context

97%

121 rated

Answer

Thus, at the 5% level of significance, we conclude that there is no significant evidence that John's rate of illness during the Christmas holidays has decreased since he increased his weekly exercise.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;