Photo AI

Researchers wanted to investigate how long it took interviewers to make a decision to hire an employee through a job interview - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2019 - Paper 3

Question icon

Question 2

Researchers-wanted-to-investigate-how-long-it-took-interviewers-to-make-a-decision-to-hire-an-employee-through-a-job-interview-AQA-A-Level Psychology-Question 2-2019-Paper 3.png

Researchers wanted to investigate how long it took interviewers to make a decision to hire an employee through a job interview. The researchers wanted to see whether... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Researchers wanted to investigate how long it took interviewers to make a decision to hire an employee through a job interview - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2019 - Paper 3

Step 1

Calculate the ratio of those interviewers who reported making their decision in under 1 minute to those interviewers who reported making their decision in more than 15 minutes.

96%

114 rated

Answer

To calculate the ratio, we refer to the data provided. The percentage of interviewers who made a hiring decision in under 1 minute is 5%, and those who made a decision in more than 15 minutes is 45%. Thus, the ratio is:

extRatio=545=19 ext{Ratio} = \frac{5}{45} = \frac{1}{9}

Therefore, the ratio of those who decided in under 1 minute to those who decided in more than 15 minutes is 1:9.

Step 2

Analyse the data in Table 4 to explain one conclusion that the researchers might draw from these results.

99%

104 rated

Answer

From the data in Table 4, a clear conclusion can be drawn that the most common contributing factor for a quick decision in hiring an employee was the experience of the interviewer. This is suggested by the tally counts, showing that many interviewers identified their experience as a significant factor, thus indicating the influence of interviewer confidence on decision-making.

Step 3

Explain two ways that subjectivity could have influenced the job interview study.

96%

101 rated

Answer

  1. The interviewers may have had different interpretations of the time it took to make the hiring decision, leading to inconsistencies in their reporting. This subjectivity could skew the data, as some might underestimate their decision time while others overestimate it.

  2. The interviewers' personal biases, such as favoritism or preconceived notions about candidates, could influence their self-reported reasons for making quick decisions. This means their reasoning might not accurately reflect objective factors, affecting the reliability of the conclusions drawn from the study.

Step 4

Explain one way the researchers could have made sure the job interview study was reliable.

98%

120 rated

Answer

The researchers could have used standardized, structured interviews with the same questions for all interviewers to increase reliability. This would ensure that each interviewer was assessed under similar conditions, making it easier to compare their responses objectively and minimizing variability in the data.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;