Photo AI

It has been estimated that if climate change led to the world’s temperature rising 2.5°C compared to the temperature in 2010, then global GDP per capita would be 15% lower by 2100 - Edexcel - A-Level Economics A - Question 8 - 2021 - Paper 2

Question icon

Question 8

It-has-been-estimated-that-if-climate-change-led-to-the-world’s-temperature-rising-2.5°C-compared-to-the-temperature-in-2010,-then-global-GDP-per-capita-would-be-15%-lower-by-2100-Edexcel-A-Level Economics A-Question 8-2021-Paper 2.png

It has been estimated that if climate change led to the world’s temperature rising 2.5°C compared to the temperature in 2010, then global GDP per capita would be 15%... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:It has been estimated that if climate change led to the world’s temperature rising 2.5°C compared to the temperature in 2010, then global GDP per capita would be 15% lower by 2100 - Edexcel - A-Level Economics A - Question 8 - 2021 - Paper 2

Step 1

Evaluate the potential trade-offs between environmental protection and other macroeconomic objectives.

96%

114 rated

Answer

Introduction

The balance between environmental protection and macroeconomic objectives is a critical debate in modern economic policy. With increasing concerns about climate change, understanding these trade-offs has become essential.

Trade-Offs

  1. Higher Economic Growth: Economic growth often leads to greater energy consumption, primarily from non-renewable resources. For instance, countries like the UK and Germany may experience increased energy usage through fossil fuels, which can halt environmental progress.

  2. Inflation: Policies aimed at protecting the environment, such as packaging modifications or recycling initiatives, can raise operational costs for firms. This can lead to increased prices for consumers, which may create inflationary pressures.

  3. Income Inequality: Environmental policies can have disparate impacts across social classes. Investing in green technologies may necessitate high capital outputs, disadvantaging lower-income populations who may find these costs prohibitive.

  4. Unemployment: Transitioning to greener practices can jeopardize jobs in sectors reliant on pollutants. Workers in such industries may lose their jobs, creating social and economic strain.

Potential Benefits and How Trade-Offs May Not Occur

  1. Increased Economic Growth Opportunities: Governments that promote environmental protection may spur economic activities aimed at innovation. For example, developing better public transportation can drive efficiency and business growth.

  2. Efficiency and Cost Reduction: Firms that adapt to ecological practices can become more efficient. Investments in new, eco-friendly technologies may lead firms to reduce their long-term operating costs as energy becomes less reliant on fossil fuels.

  3. Job Creation in Sustainable Industries: Policies that focus on the environment can stimulate new job opportunities in sectors like renewable energy, carbon capture, and recycling, thereby offsetting some unemployment issues.

Conclusion

In summary, while there are notable trade-offs between environmental protection and other macroeconomic goals such as growth, inflation, inequality, and employment, there are also significant opportunities to harmonize these objectives. Emphasizing sustainable practices could ultimately lead to a balanced approach that fosters economic growth while ensuring environmental sustainability.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;