A non-uniform beam AD has weight W newtons and length 4 m - Edexcel - A-Level Maths Mechanics - Question 6 - 2014 - Paper 1
Question 6
A non-uniform beam AD has weight W newtons and length 4 m. It is held in equilibrium in a horizontal position by two vertical ropes attached to the beam. The ropes a... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:A non-uniform beam AD has weight W newtons and length 4 m - Edexcel - A-Level Maths Mechanics - Question 6 - 2014 - Paper 1
Step 1
Find the distance of the centre of mass of the beam from A.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To determine the distance of the centre of mass (d) from point A, we can use the formula for a uniform rod:
The beam is 4 m long with sections of 1 m each at points A and D, leaving a segment of 2 m in the middle.
Considering the weight W acting at the centre of gravity (2 m from A), the equation can be set up as:
T+2T=W
Here, T is the tension in the rope attached to B.
Rearranging gives:
T=3W
The forces balance at the point of interest.
Therefore, substituting back, the distance (d) from A can be calculated as:
d=32⋅4=38extm
Step 2
an expression for the tension in the rope attached to B, giving your answer in terms of k and W.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To find the tension in the rope attached to B, we return to our earlier established relationships and consider the additional load:
Sum of vertical forces gives:
TB+2(kW)=W
This represents tension T_B plus double the load attached.
Rearranging to solve for T_B leads to:
TB=W−2(kW)=W(1−2k)
This is the expression for tension in the rope at B.
Step 3
the set of possible values of k for which both ropes remain taut.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
For both ropes to remain taut, T_B must be greater than 0.
Setting the inequality:
W(1−2k)>0
Simplifying leads to:
1−2k>0
Solving this inequality yields:
0<k<21
Therefore, k must lie between 0 and \frac{1}{2} for the conditions to hold.