Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto. In the 2017 General Ele... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1
Step 1
compare and contrast different opinions in the source
Answer
From the source, one can observe differing opinions on the responsibilities of MPs towards the electorate and their party manifestos. The first letter emphasizes that MPs should adhere to their party's manifesto and represent the interests of their constituents. It underscores the integrity of the democratic process and the importance of clear manifestos for governance. In contrast, the second letter highlights the necessity for flexibility in representation, suggesting that changing public opinion should influence MPs' decisions. This serves to reflect the dynamic nature of democracy, indicating that MPs may need to prioritize broader democratic principles over strict allegiance to party lines.
Step 2
analyse and debate these views in a balanced way
Answer
When evaluating these views, it is essential to consider the implications of strict adherence to party manifestos. On one hand, following a manifesto ensures accountability and trust in politicians. When constituents elect MPs based on specific commitments, there is an expectation that these commitments will be honored. On the other hand, inflexibility may lead to discord between public sentiment and legislative actions. In contemporary politics, where issues rapidly evolve, the ability of MPs to adapt is crucial. This flexibility allows for responsiveness to the electorate's current needs rather than being tethered to outdated commitments.
Step 3
evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The source presents a compelling argument that MPs should balance their loyalty to party manifestos with the need to represent current public sentiment. While the necessity for manifestos is reiterated, the source also raises pertinent questions about the nature of democracy, suggesting that the ethical duty of MPs extends beyond rigid party loyalty. Thus, the evaluation of their freedom to act may derive less from legal or procedural constraints and more from a moral obligation to their constituents, which complicates the simplistic view of obligation versus freedom. In summary, the source encourages a nuanced understanding of the responsibilities that come with public office.