Photo AI
To what extent does nationalism have a consistent view of self-determination? You must use appropriate thinkers you have studied to support your answer and consider differing views in a balanced way. - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 7 - 2022 - Paper 2
Question 7
To what extent does nationalism have a consistent view of self-determination? You must use appropriate thinkers you have studied to support your answer and consider... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:To what extent does nationalism have a consistent view of self-determination? You must use appropriate thinkers you have studied to support your answer and consider differing views in a balanced way. - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 7 - 2022 - Paper 2
Step 1
Points in Agreement
Answer
Most nationalists advocate for self-determination as a core principle. This is notable in both liberal and anti-colonial views, which emphasize the necessity for nations to govern themselves and oppose oppression. Thinkers like Gandhi highlight that self-determination is crucial for nations that have historically been suppressed.
Moreover, both liberal and anti colonial nationalists argue for a rational approach toward self-determination, suggesting that nations should have the right to define their governance and resist external oppression. This perspective indicates a consistent view that aligns nationalism with the right to self-determine.
Step 2
Points in Disagreement
Answer
Conversely, there exists a divide among nationalists regarding the reasons for self-determination. Some conservative nationalists challenge the universal application of self-determination, emphasizing identity and cultural reasons. Thinkers like Mazin argue that those seeking self-determination often prioritize the interests of their own ethnic group over a collective national identity.
Furthermore, expansionist nationalisms outright reject the right of other nations to self-determine, viewing this as a threat to their own national integrity. This faction tends to deny self-determination to nations they consider inferior, contrasting sharply with the liberal perspective that advocates for all nations’ rights.