Photo AI
This source is adapted from an article in the Financial Times in November 2019 - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 1
This source is adapted from an article in the Financial Times in November 2019. Source 1 Nigel Farage claimed that Brexit party supporters were offered peerages in... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:This source is adapted from an article in the Financial Times in November 2019 - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
compare and contrast different opinions in the source
Answer
The source presents contrasting views on the legitimacy and functionality of the House of Lords. On one side, Nigel Farage's opinion illustrates a perspective that criticizes the House of Lords for lacking democratic legitimacy, particularly highlighting the average age of peers (70 years) and their professional backdrop. He suggests that the current set-up produces an unprofessional chamber.
Conversely, the source mentions that the Lords display 'independence of thought,' with crossbenchers not alignining themselves to political parties and working to hold the government accountable. The independent House of Lords Appointments Commission is noted for vetting nominations which, according to the source, has led to a more diverse membership, including over 25% of women and significant representation from ethnic minorities.
Step 2
examine and debate these views in a balanced way
Answer
When examining the opinions presented, one can argue that while Farage highlights genuine concerns regarding the democratic legitimacy and age of the Lords, it is essential to consider the counterpoint regarding their independence. The ability of the Lords to regularly defeat government proposals shows a level of scrutiny that can be viewed as beneficial in the political landscape.
However, one might argue that even with this scrutiny, the Lords need reform to address concerns about being an unelected chamber. The seemingly slow adaptation of the Lords to modern times raises questions about whether they can adequately represent the current diversity of society.
In debating these views, it is crucial to consider the ongoing discussions about reforming the House of Lords, weighing the advantages of having experienced individuals in the chamber against the need for a body that is more reflective of the populace.
Step 3
analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The source provides a nuanced picture of the House of Lords. On one hand, it reflects criticisms about its legitimacy and adaptability, noting the aging demographic of its members and its perceived unprofessionalism. Additionally, it highlights the slow pace of reform which could hinder its effectiveness in addressing contemporary issues.
On the other hand, it emphasizes the role of crossbenchers and the importance of independent thought within the chamber. The mention of the Appointments Commission suggests an effort to ensure diverse representation, which could counterbalance the criticisms. Ultimately, while the source presents valid concerns, it also points to positive aspects, suggesting a complex dynamic that merits careful consideration in evaluating the need for reform.