Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto. In Source 2, differing ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1
Step 1
compare and contrast differing opinions in the source
Answer
The first letter in Source 2 argues that MPs must adhere to their party’s manifesto and follow the wishes of their constituents. It suggests that ignoring referendum results would be a significant breach of trust. In contrast, the second letter posits that MPs should have the liberty to shift their stance based on evolving circumstances, as long as they remain accountable to the electorate. This introduces the notion of adaptability in democratic governance.
Step 2
evaluate and debate these views in a balanced way
Answer
The responsibility of MPs is critical to maintain democratic integrity; however, the dynamic nature of politics may necessitate changing positions. The first viewpoint supports the idea of a fixed allegiance to party manifestos to ensure transparency and trust, while the second viewpoint acknowledges the need for responsiveness to changing public opinion, suggesting that the electorate’s needs may sometimes compete with party loyalty.
Step 3
analyze and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
From the source, it can be determined that there is a tension between adhering to party manifestos and responding to constituents’ shifting views. Burke’s stance implies that while MPs hold their party positions, they also bear the ethical responsibility of considering their constituents' current needs, thereby allowing for a degree of independence from strict party lines. This complexity underlines dynamic interactions within democratic structures.