Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto. In the 2017 General Ele... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party's manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1
Step 1
compare and contrast different opinions in the source
Answer
The first letter emphasizes the importance of adhering to party manifestos and referendum results, highlighting that MPs should act as trustees for their constituents and be accountable to them. In contrast, the second letter argues that the democratic process allows for flexibility, asserting that changing circumstances should influence MPs' decisions and that they are not mere mouthpieces for their parties. This illustrates a fundamental debate about the responsibilities of MPs—whether to prioritize party loyalty or to act according to their conscience and the public's interest.
Step 2
evaluate and debate these views in a balanced way
Answer
Supporters of the notion that MPs should follow party manifestos argue that failing to do so undermines electoral promises and erodes public trust in political institutions. However, those who argue for a more flexible interpretation of democracy claim that MPs must be responsive to changing public sentiments and situations. This tension raises important questions about accountability and representation, as rigidly adhering to party lines may contradict the expectations of the electorate.
Step 3
analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The source presents contrasting views on the role of MPs in democracy. It emphasizes the classic argument about MPs' duty to their constituents versus their allegiance to party manifestos. The Burkean perspective highlights that true representation may require MPs to deviate from party mandates when moral or ethical considerations dictate. This illustrates a critical aspect of democratic governance: the balance between party discipline and personal judgment, challenging MPs to navigate these competing loyalties responsibly.