Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty. In your response you must: - compare and contrast opinions i... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
compare and contrast opinions in the source
Answer
The source presents varied opinions on the role of the Supreme Court in relation to parliamentary sovereignty. Andrew Bridgen criticizes the Court for undermining democratic processes, expressing that it disregards the referendum vote from 2016. On the other hand, Gina Miller argues that the Court’s actions can be seen as a protection of parliamentary sovereignty against overreach by the executive. These contrasting views highlight a divisive perspective on the Court's influence; whereas some see it as a threat, others perceive it as a safeguard.
Step 2
evaluate the view expressed in the source in a balanced way
Answer
Evaluating the view that the Supreme Court strengthens parliamentary sovereignty, one could argue that the judicial reviews acted by the Court serve to challenge executive decisions that may bypass parliamentary approval. This helps maintain the system of checks and balances essential to a functioning democracy. Conversely, critics like Bridgen suggest that such judicial intervention undermines the democratic will, represented by the referendum. This view emphasizes that increased judicial power may hinder Parliament's authority.
Step 3
analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The source indicates that judicial reviews are vital in maintaining the accountability of the executive. The discussion includes the notion that the Court does not have a defined limit in its relationship with Parliament, leaving room for various interpretations. Gina Miller provides a perspective that positions the Supreme Court as an essential body for asserting parliamentary sovereignty, particularly against governmental overreach. However, the criticisms highlight potential concerns surrounding the legitimacy of the Court's involvement in political matters, reflecting a complex interplay between judicial authority and parliamentary sovereignty.