Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty. In your response you must: - compare and contrast different ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
compare and contrast different opinions in the source
Answer
The source presents contrasting opinions on the role of the Supreme Court regarding parliamentary sovereignty. Andrew Bridgen criticizes the Court, describing its judgment as an 'absolute disgrace' that undermines democracy and ignores the 2016 referendum vote. In contrast, Gina Miller suggests that the Court's involvement can actually bolster parliamentary sovereignty by ensuring checks and balances on an 'over mighty executive'. This comparison highlights the tension between their perspectives: while Bridgen sees judicial reviews as a threat to Parliament's authority, Miller frames them as essential for maintaining parliamentary power against executive overreach.
Step 2
discuss how the evidence in the source is a balanced way
Answer
The source balances opinions by presenting the criticisms of the Supreme Court alongside supportive perspectives. It captures the argument that judicial reviews could either claim sovereignty for Parliament or undermine it, as indicated by Miller's assertion that the reviews legitimize Parliament's role against executive actions. This balanced approach ensures that both sides of the debate are considered, allowing the reader to understand the complexity of the issue.
Step 3
analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The information in the source suggests that the Supreme Court plays a dual role in the context of parliamentary sovereignty. On one hand, it affirms the authority of Parliament through judicial reviews that challenge the government, thereby reinforcing parliamentary power. On the other hand, it risks undermining that sovereignty if perceived as overstepping its bounds, as noted by critics. This analysis reveals that the Supreme Court is neither entirely a protector nor a challenger of parliamentary sovereignty, but rather a balancing force that maintains a dynamic relationship between Parliament and the executive branch.