Photo AI
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty. In your response you must: - compare and contrast opinions i... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
The source presents two contrasting viewpoints on the role of the Supreme Court in relation to parliamentary sovereignty. On one hand, Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen criticizes the Supreme Court, suggesting that it undermines parliamentary sovereignty by overriding the referendum vote from 2016. He believes this judgement rendered by the Court is an affront to democracy, where unelected judges have ignored the will of the people.
Conversely, Gina Miller argues that the Supreme Court's decision is a positive affirmation of parliamentary sovereignty. She emphasizes that judicial reviews are necessary to maintain the checks and balances within the government, thereby reinforcing the role of Parliament. This perspective asserts that despite the challenges to the executive branch, the Court’s actions prioritize parliamentary authority.
Step 2
Answer
The debate in the source is presented with a certain level of balance, showcasing both sides. It captures Bridgen's frustrations as well as Miller's support for the Supreme Court's role. However, it leans slightly towards the view that supports judicial review, as Miller's argument is given more depth and rationale compared to Bridgen's critique. This imbalance indicates an underlying confidence in the judicial system as a protector of parliamentary sovereignty, which slightly overshadows Bridgen's perspective.
Step 3
Answer
The information conveyed in the source underscores the tension between parliamentary sovereignty and judicial power. Bridgen’s comments reflect a common concern about unelected judges influencing democratic decisions, particularly in the context of Brexit. In contrast, Miller's viewpoint highlights the importance of judicial oversight as a safeguard against the potential overreach of the executive. While Bridgen paints the situation as a loss for democracy, Miller frames it as a necessary check on power, thus reflecting the importance of maintaining a functional balance between Parliament and the judiciary.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered