Photo AI
The proposal to build the waste incinerator was rejected in June 2020 - AQA - GCSE Geography - Question 3 - 2021 - Paper 3
Question 3
The proposal to build the waste incinerator was rejected in June 2020. Do you think that this was the correct decision? Use evidence from the resources booklet and y... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:The proposal to build the waste incinerator was rejected in June 2020 - AQA - GCSE Geography - Question 3 - 2021 - Paper 3
Step 1
Do you think that this was the correct decision?
Answer
In evaluating whether the rejection of the waste incinerator proposal in June 2020 was the correct decision, it is essential to consider multiple dimensions including environmental, economic, and social factors.
From an environmental standpoint, waste incinerators are known to produce emissions that can negatively affect air quality and contribute to health issues in nearby communities. The concerns regarding potential air pollution links to health risks related to asthma, respiratory illnesses, and broader climate change issues speak to why many may view the proposal's rejection positively. Moreover, incinerators may not be sustainable in the long term, as they encourage waste generation and reliance on fossil fuels for energy recovery.
Economically, while waste incineration can be seen as an efficient way to manage large volumes of waste and convert it to energy, one must consider the long-term costs and benefits. The initial investment and ongoing operational costs could divert funds from alternative waste management solutions such as recycling and composting, which are often more environmentally friendly.
Socially, the decision reflects community concerns about waste management practices, which may lead to increased public engagement in sustainable practices. Communities often favor solutions that lead to cleaner environments and actively involve them in waste reduction strategies, rather than simply burning waste.
In conclusion, based on environmental risks, economic implications, and community concerns, the rejection of the waste incinerator proposal could be justified. It encourages exploration of more sustainable and community-friendly alternatives to waste management.
Step 2
Use evidence from the resources booklet and your own understanding to explain your answer.
Answer
Evidence from the resources booklet indicates that waste incineration is often criticized for its environmental impact, particularly regarding air pollution and carbon emissions. The booklet suggests that incineration can contribute to climate change, as the burning of waste releases greenhouse gases.
Furthermore, the booklet highlights the increasing emphasis on a circular economy where waste is minimized, and resources are reused. Alternatives like recycling and composting not only mitigate some of the environmental concerns linked to incinerators but also promote community engagement and education around resource management.
There are also indications in the resources that the management of waste should be a multi-faceted strategy incorporating various approaches rather than relying on one method alone, such as incineration. This holistic approach to waste management is becoming increasingly relevant to address not just the symptoms of waste but also its root causes.