Study Sources B and C in the Sources Booklet - AQA - GCSE History - Question 2 - 2023 - Paper 1

Sources B and C offer varying degrees of usefulness for historians studying the Gulf War, 1990–91.

Evaluation of Source B

Source B presents a cartoon that reflects public sentiment towards the Gulf War. It serves as a critique of the U.S. military action and symbolizes the anxiety of ordinary citizens. The source can be viewed as useful because it illustrates the social context and prevailing attitudes during the conflict, particularly towards U.S. involvement. This perspective is valuable since it highlights dissenting views, which are often less documented in official records.

However, the cartoon's exaggeration may also lead to a lack of accuracy, as art often distorts realities for persuasive purposes. Therefore, while it provides insight into public opinion, it should be corroborated with other historical evidence for a well-rounded interpretation.

Evaluation of Source C

Source C comprises a statement from a British Prime Minister about the war's justification. This source proves useful as it reflects government policy and intentions during the Gulf War. It gives historians direct insight into the rationale provided by political leaders, which is crucial for understanding the broader geopolitical context. Furthermore, the context surrounding Britain’s involvement enables a more comprehensive understanding of allied relations during the war.

Though initially useful, Source C must be critically evaluated regarding the bias inherent in governmental propaganda. Such statements often serve the interests of specific political narratives, which can manipulate public perception and may not reflect the complexities of the situation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both sources hold significant value in studying the Gulf War. Source B is valuable for understanding public sentiment, while Source C helps elucidate the political rationale. Cross-referencing these sources with additional contextual knowledge enhances their utility, allowing historians to develop a nuanced understanding of the war's complexities.