Photo AI
The two texts show the experiences of certain groups of people - Edexcel - GCSE English Language - Question 7 - 2019 - Paper 1
Question 7
The two texts show the experiences of certain groups of people. What similarities do these groups share in these extracts? Use evidence from both texts to support ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:The two texts show the experiences of certain groups of people - Edexcel - GCSE English Language - Question 7 - 2019 - Paper 1
Step 1
What similarities do these groups share in these extracts?
Answer
Both groups experience daily challenges and restrictions in their lives. In Text 1, the women have moments of community during their lunch breaks, while in Text 2, individuals attempt to navigate travel and daily activities under restrictive conditions.
Notably, both texts reference legislation affecting the groups: Text 1 mentions work-related mandates, and Text 2 describes anti-Jewish measures. This highlights shared experiences of oppression and a sense of frustration with their circumstances.
Furthermore, both texts include perspectives from individuals who speak out against their treatment, thus illustrating how both groups seek to address their situations and advocate for better conditions.
Step 2
Compare how the writers of Text 1 and Text 2 present ideas and perspectives about discrimination.
Answer
The texts target different audiences and employ varying frameworks to discuss discrimination. Text 1 is presented as a biography aimed at a wide audience, showcasing a first-person account of Jewish women's experiences. In contrast, Text 2 is crafted as a personal diary, offering an intimate perspective not meant for broader readership.
Both texts utilize language that conveys distress. For instance, Text 1 refers to the treatment as 'ridiculous' and includes strong metaphors concerning the environment they find themselves in. On the other hand, Text 2 presents a more personal narrative, detailing the harsher realities faced by Jewish individuals under discriminatory laws.
Moreover, the authors’ approaches differ in how they depict personal experiences and collective struggles: Text 1 emphasizes community and resilience, while Text 2 reflects individual despair and the complexity of the laws affecting people’s lives.
Ultimately, while both writers convey a shared horror at the injustices being faced, they offer unique perspectives that reveal the multifaceted nature of discrimination.