Photo AI
Explain two of the following: - The importance of Nasser for leadership of the Arab world - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2018 - Paper 1
Question 3
Explain two of the following: - The importance of Nasser for leadership of the Arab world. - The importance of the occupied territories following the Six Day War (1... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Explain two of the following: - The importance of Nasser for leadership of the Arab world - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2018 - Paper 1
Step 1
The importance of Nasser for leadership of the Arab world.
Answer
Gamal Abdel Nasser's role in the Arab world was pivotal due to his staunch anti-imperialist stance and advocacy for Arab nationalism. Firstly, his rejection of Western influence was significant; he resisted the British and American dominance in the region, particularly demonstrated by his nationalization of the Suez Canal in 1956. This act not only provoked international tensions but also solidified his image as a leader fighting for Arab sovereignty.
Secondly, Nasser's leadership in uniting Arab nations was crucial. His initiative in convening the Arab Summit in Cairo in 1964 sought to rally Arab states in collective action against Israel, especially regarding the Palestinian issue. By calling for solidarity against external threats, Nasser cultivated a sense of Arab unity that was vital in the political landscape of the time.
Lastly, Nasser’s influence extended beyond his immediate policies. His vision inspired various nationalist movements across the Arab world, contributing to the broader ideological framework that sought to liberate Arab peoples from colonial legacies.
Step 2
The importance of the occupied territories following the Six Day War (1967) for Arab-Israeli relations.
Answer
The Six Day War of 1967 was a critical turning point in Arab-Israeli relations, primarily due to the territories occupied by Israel during the conflict. The acquisition of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights added complexity to the already fraught bilateral relations.
One major consequence was the intensification of the Palestinian national identity. The occupation led to increased resistance movements and highlighted the plight of Palestinians, thus becoming central to Arab-Israeli discourse. The territories became ground zero for conflict as they turned into symbols of both hope and struggle for Palestinian self-determination.
Moreover, the occupied territories influenced the diplomatic strategies of Arab states. Egypt and Jordan, having lost territories such as the West Bank and Gaza, found themselves in a vulnerable position, prompting a reevaluation of their approaches to Israel. The notion of territorial exchange for peace emerged, becoming a fundamental theme in subsequent negotiations, as countries sought to reclaim lost land while striving towards a lasting peace framework.