Photo AI
Study Sources A and B in the Sources Booklet - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 2 - 2020 - Paper 1
Question 2
Study Sources A and B in the Sources Booklet. How useful are Sources A and B for an enquiry into the effects of a gas attack? Explain your answer, using Sources A ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Study Sources A and B in the Sources Booklet - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 2 - 2020 - Paper 1
Step 1
Evaluation of Source A
Answer
Source A is valuable as it illustrates the impact of a gas attack, noting both physical effects and the number of individuals affected. It suggests that doctors could do little to alleviate suffering after exposure to gas. The source is credible, being authored by Cushing, a surgeon, providing eyewitness insights into the medical consequences of gas attacks.
Moreover, the source reveals the specific symptoms associated with gas exposure, such as internal suffering and death, thereby offering critical information for understanding the effects of gas.
However, limitations exist, including a lack of broader context regarding the extent of gas use historically, and the potential bias stemming from the personal experiences of Cushing.
Step 2
Evaluation of Source B
Answer
Source B complements Source A by depicting the grim reality of gas attacks. Taken around 1918, it serves to document ongoing issues with gas even late in the war. The source portrays the medical response to gas attacks, underscoring the persistence of gas in combat situations.
The provenance of the photograph as an official record reinforces its reliability, yet it may not encompass the entire range of experiences faced by soldiers. It could lack emotion or broader narrative, focusing strictly on the medical response.
Despite this, it effectively highlights the dangers of gas warfare and frames the conversation about the evolution of its usage.
Step 3
Conclusion and Contextual Factors
Answer
In conclusion, both sources are useful in providing insights into the effects of gas attacks. Source A offers an expert's clinical perspective, while Source B provides a visual representation that supports the narrative of ongoing struggles with gas throughout the war.
Furthermore, considering the historical context, the use of tear and other chemical gases evolved, and both sources shed light on the importance of medical responses to these evolving threats. Together, they provide a more nuanced understanding of the effects of gas warfare.