Photo AI
Study Sources B and C - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1
Question 3
Study Sources B and C. How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933? Explain your answer, using Sources B an... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Study Sources B and C - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1
Step 1
How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933?
Answer
To assess the usefulness of Sources B and C, it's crucial to analyze their content and context.
Source B provides insights into the political maneuvers and strategies employed by Hitler to gain power. It may discuss the role of the Nazi Party's election tactics and how they appealed to the electorate's desires. This context is essential in understanding why Hitler was able to ascend to the Chancellorship during a tumultuous period in Germany.
On the other hand, Source C might focus more on external factors that contributed to Hitler's rise, such as economic conditions and political instability. Understanding these divergent focuses helps us gauge the overall usefulness of the sources in forming a comprehensive picture of the reasons behind Hitler's appointment.
In terms of historical context, by 1933, the Nazis had gained significant traction in the Reichstag, which indicates that political dynamics played a major role. The context surrounding the Great Depression and the public's disillusionment with Weimar democracy enhances the analysis further.
Step 2
What is the main difference between these views?
Answer
The main difference between Interpretations 1 and 2 lies in their focus on the reasons behind Hitler's appointment. Interpretation 1 suggests that Hitler was appointed Chancellor due to political decisions made by influential figures in Germany, emphasizing the roles of key politicians and backroom deals. In contrast, Interpretation 2 emphasizes grassroots support for Hitler from the populace, stressing the importance of wide public support and electoral success as crucial factors.
This difference illustrates how perspectives can vary based on emphasis—whether on elite political maneuvering or popular support.
Step 3
Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933.
Answer
One reason for the differing views in Interpretations 1 and 2 can be attributed to the sources used by the authors. Interpretation 1 may be informed by elite-focused sources, which highlight political dealings and the influence of key figures, such as Hindenburg. Conversely, Interpretation 2 might rely on sources that prioritize public sentiment and electoral outcomes, representing a more grassroots viewpoint. This divergence in source material leads to different emphases in explaining Hitler's rise to power.
Step 4
How do you agree with Interpretation 2 about the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933?
Answer
In agreement with Interpretation 2, I argue that while political machinations were undoubtedly present, the role of popular support cannot be understated. The Nazis’ ability to capitalize on public discontent during the economic crisis and their promises for a stronger Germany resonated with many voters. This grassroots support was instrumental in Hitler's eventual appointment as Chancellor.
Furthermore, the elections leading up to 1933 demonstrate that the Nazi Party's success was bolstered by widespread public rallies and propaganda that mobilized citizens actively, reflecting the sentiments of disillusionment with other political options. Therefore, Interpretation 2 provides a critical perspective that emphasizes the importance of public support in Hitler's rise.