Photo AI
To what extent do you agree that accounts of non-scriptural miracles are convincing? - Scottish Highers Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies - Question 26 - 2018
Question 26
To what extent do you agree that accounts of non-scriptural miracles are convincing?
Worked Solution & Example Answer:To what extent do you agree that accounts of non-scriptural miracles are convincing? - Scottish Highers Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies - Question 26 - 2018
Step 1
Non-Scriptural Miracles: Analysis
Answer
Non-scriptural miracles refer to events that are perceived as miraculous but are not documented in religious texts. Examples include healing miracles in hospitals or spontaneous recoveries that defy medical explanation. Analyzing these accounts requires examining personal testimonies and the context in which these events occur, which may enhance their credibility for some individuals.
Step 2
Arguments For Convincing Non-Scriptural Miracles
Answer
Supporters argue that accounts of non-scriptural miracles are compelling due to the direct, personal nature of the experiences reported. Personal testimonies often resonate strongly with individuals, as they are relatable and evoke emotions. In addition, various studies have shown that reports of miracle healings can lead to psychological benefits for the individuals involved, which can further validate their experiences.
Step 3
Arguments Against Convincing Non-Scriptural Miracles
Answer
On the other hand, critics question the reliability of non-scriptural miracle accounts due to lack of empirical evidence. Many instances can be explained by coincidence or psychological phenomena, such as the placebo effect. Additionally, some argue that such accounts can be misleading, as they are often anecdotal and lack rigorous scientific backing.
Step 4
Conclusion and Personal Evaluation
Answer
In conclusion, while accounts of non-scriptural miracles can be seen as convincing due to their personal nature, a critical evaluation suggests that they often lack the robustness of empirical evidence. Therefore, I believe that such accounts should be approached with caution, recognizing the subjective nature of personal experiences against the backdrop of scientific inquiry.