Photo AI
Last Updated Sep 26, 2025
Simplified Revision Notes for A-Level AQA Politics
Revision notes with simplified explanations to understand quickly and effectively.
394+ students studying
10.3.2 Factors Affecting PM-Cabinet Relationship & Power Balance
The relationship between the Prime Minister (PM) and the Cabinet is central to the functioning of the UK government. This dynamic has evolved over time, influenced by various factors that shape the balance of power. Understanding these factors is crucial for analysing contemporary British politics.
Factors Affecting the Relationship Between the PM and the Cabinet:
- Leadership Style of the PM:
- Dominant Leadership: Some PMs adopt a dominant leadership style, exerting significant control over the Cabinet.
- Example: Margaret Thatcher's authoritative approach led to a highly centralised decision-making process. Her dominance eventually caused friction within the Cabinet, leading to resignations and her eventual downfall.
- Collegial Leadership: Other PMs prefer a more inclusive, collegial approach, fostering collaboration and discussion.
- Example: John Major adopted a more consensual style, seeking Cabinet input and striving for collective decision-making.
- Political Context and Party Dynamics:
- Strong Party Unity: A united party often allows the PM to maintain a stronger grip on the Cabinet.
- Example: Tony Blair's initial years were marked by a strong Labour Party unity, enabling him to dominate the Cabinet with his "sofa government" style.
- Party Factions and Divisions: Internal party divisions can weaken the PM's control and strengthen the role of the Cabinet.
- Example: Theresa May's tenure was marked by deep divisions within the Conservative Party over Brexit, which significantly weakened her authority over the Cabinet.
- External Crises and Events:
- National Crises: During times of crisis, the PM may centralise power to ensure swift decision-making.
- Example: Boris Johnson's response to the COVID-19 pandemic saw a centralisation of decision-making, with key policies being directed from the PM's office rather than through collective Cabinet deliberation.
- Economic Challenges: Economic crises often require cohesive Cabinet support to implement necessary but potentially unpopular policies.
- Example: The 2008 financial crisis saw Gordon Brown's Cabinet working closely together to navigate economic recovery efforts.
- Media and Public Opinion:
- Media Influence: The media can play a significant role in shaping the PM's relationship with the Cabinet.
- Example: Media pressure and public scrutiny led to the resignation of Matt Hancock as Health Secretary in 2021, despite initial support from Boris Johnson.
- Public Approval: High public approval of the PM can reinforce their dominance, while low approval can embolden Cabinet dissent.
- Example: David Cameron's high approval ratings post-2010 elections helped him maintain control, while declining approval during the EU referendum campaign weakened his position.
- Institutional Factors and Constitutional Conventions:
- Cabinet Committees: The use of Cabinet committees can decentralise decision-making or centralise it, depending on the PM's approach.
- Example: Tony Blair's extensive use of Cabinet committees and informal meetings ("sofa government") effectively sidelined the full Cabinet's role in decision-making.
- Patronage Powers: The PM's power to appoint, promote, and dismiss ministers impacts their influence over the Cabinet.
- Example: Boris Johnson's appointments of loyalists to key positions in 2019 demonstrated the use of patronage to secure a compliant Cabinet.
Changes in the Relationship Between the PM and the Cabinet:
- Evolving Leadership Styles:
- Historical Shifts: Over time, the leadership style of PMs has varied, reflecting broader political and societal changes.
- Example: The shift from the more collegial style of the post-war consensus era to the dominant style of Thatcher and the pragmatic approach of Blair.
- Impact of Technology and Media:
- 24/7 News Cycle: The constant media scrutiny in the digital age has increased pressure on both the PM and the Cabinet, impacting their relationship.
- Example: The immediate media reactions and social media discourse during Theresa May's Brexit negotiations highlighted the intense scrutiny modern leaders face.
- Institutional Reforms:
- Cabinet Office and Special Advisors: The growth of the Cabinet Office and the role of special advisors have changed the dynamics of decision-making.
- Example: Alastair Campbell's role during Blair's premiership as a key advisor demonstrated the increasing influence of non-elected officials in shaping government policy.
Balance of Power Between the PM and the Cabinet:
- Centralisation vs. Decentralisation:
- Centralised Power: Some PMs have centralised power within their office, reducing the traditional role of the Cabinet.
- Example: Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair both centralised decision-making, relying heavily on a close circle of advisors and key ministers.
- Decentralised Power: Other PMs have fostered a more balanced relationship, allowing for greater Cabinet input.
- Example: John Major and Harold Wilson encouraged more collective decision-making within the Cabinet.
- Contemporary Balance:
- Boris Johnson's Tenure: Johnson's approach has varied, initially centralising power but facing significant Cabinet pushback during crises.
- Example: The controversy over Dominic Cummings and the handling of COVID-19 policies saw tensions between the PM and his Cabinet, highlighting the complex and fluid nature of the balance of power.
- Future Trends:
- Impact of Brexit: The ongoing impact of Brexit continues to shape the balance of power, with future PMs likely navigating a landscape marked by evolving party dynamics and public expectations.
- Example: The leadership styles of PMs post-Brexit, such as Rishi Sunak or potential future leaders, will be influenced by the need to manage both internal party factions and broader national interests.
Conclusion: The relationship between the Prime Minister and the Cabinet is dynamic and influenced by a multitude of factors, including leadership style, political context, external events, media influence, and institutional reforms. While the balance of power has fluctuated over time, the interplay between centralisation and collective decision-making remains a defining feature of UK governance. Contemporary examples, such as the tenures of Boris Johnson and his predecessors, provide valuable insights into the complexities of this relationship and its impact on effective government leadership.
500K+ Students Use These Powerful Tools to Master For their A-Level Exams.
Enhance your understanding with flashcards, quizzes, and exams—designed to help you grasp key concepts, reinforce learning, and master any topic with confidence!
27 exams created
Exam Builder on
Create custom exams across topics for better practice!
Try Politics exam builderOther Revision Notes related to you should explore
Discover More Revision Notes Related to to Deepen Your Understanding and Improve Your Mastery
96%
114 rated
The power of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet
The factors governing the Prime Minister’s selection of ministers.
351+ studying
192KViews