Future Constitutional Consequences

Turning Point in UK's Political History

• Many political commentators view the Scottish independence referendum as a significant turning point in the UK's political landscape.
• The implications of the referendum extend beyond Scotland, impacting the broader constitutional structure of the United Kingdom.

Reviewing the UK Constitutional Situation

• Former Conservative Party leader William Hague MP proposed a government committee in September 2014 to review the entire UK constitutional situation.
• The call for a comprehensive review reflects the recognition of the need to reassess the constitutional framework in light of increased devolution.

English Votes for English Laws (EVEL)

• The devolution of powers to the Scottish Parliament prompted discussions about the role of MPs in decision-making, particularly in England.
• Calls for 'English votes for English laws' (EVEL) emerged, advocating that only English MPs should vote on laws affecting England to address concerns about asymmetric devolution.

Controversies and Differing Views

• EVEL proposals were contentious, with differing views among parties.
• The Liberal Democrats tended to favour more decentralisation, while the Conservatives were cautious, believing in the unity of the UK and opposing full devolution.

Implementation of EVEL (October 2015)

• A form of EVEL was introduced in October 2015, requiring laws affecting only England to be approved separately by a majority of English MPs.
• This attempt aimed to address concerns about asymmetry in devolution and ensure that decisions impacting only England had appropriate representation.

---

Future Constitutional Consequences

Scrapping of EVEL (July 2021)

• EVEL was scrapped in July 2021, with Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg stating that it undermined Parliament.
• The decision sparked debate within the Conservative Party, as it was the only form of devolution available to England, reflecting differing perspectives on the balance of representation.

Two Types of MPs

• The EVEL debate raised concerns about creating two types of MPs - those who could vote on all legislation and those limited to voting on agreed UK legislation.
• This underscores the complexities of balancing regional representation and the unity of the UK in a post-devolution constitutional framework.

Conclusion:

The division of powers between devolved and reserved categories, as outlined in the Scotland Act (1998), establishes a structured framework for governance in Scotland. While devolved powers grant autonomy to the Scottish Parliament in crucial areas, reserved powers ensure Scottish independence referenda not only impacted Scotland but triggered wider consequences for the UK's constitutional structure. The debate around EVEL exemplifies the ongoing challenges in balancing regional autonomy with national unity. The scrapping of EVEL in 2021 highlights the dynamic nature of constitutional discussions and the diversity of opinions within political parties on the appropriate level of devolution. Devolved powers ensure a unified approach to matters affecting the entire UK. This balance reflects the collaborative nature of the United Kingdom's constitutional arrangement.