Government Response-Economic Inequality

Welfare to Work Strategy:

• Administration: Managed by both federal and state governments.
• Components: Links welfare support, such as Medicaid health insurance, childcare, food stamps, and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), to employment-seeking activities.
• Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): Provides financial benefits, up to $3,618 for the first child, exclusively for those actively seeking or engaged in employment.

Successes:

• Increased Employment: Supporters argue that Welfare to Work has incentivised more individuals to enter the workforce.
• Income Improvement: Claims that this approach has elevated the incomes of the impoverished while curbing welfare expenditure.

Criticisms:

• Low-Wage Labor: Critics contend that the strategy has compelled many to accept low-wage jobs.
• Inequality and Poverty: Opponents argue that despite its implementation, Welfare to Work has not effectively reduced inequality or poverty levels in the USA.

Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF):

Funding Structure:

• Federal Financing: TANF is federally financed.
• State Administration: Operational at the state level, offering employability and childcare support.

Duration Limitation:

• Five-Year Cap: TANF benefits are available for a maximum of five years.

---

Government Responses to Economic Inequalities

Successes:

Single Parent Poverty Rate:

• Since its introduction in 1996, TANF has contributed to a decline in the child poverty rate among single parents.

Criticisms:

• High Child Poverty: Despite some success, the overall child poverty rate in the US remains one of the highest among developed nations.
• Flexible Fund Usage: Block grants to states have few restrictions, leading to varied use; for instance, Michigan allocates funds to university scholarships, while Texas directs them to foster care.