Sample Answer for Explain why different groups would have contrasting views about regenerating vacant land in cities.

Regeneration can produce winners and losers. Improved housing can provide much-needed homes for an area, but if prices are too high, then local people may not be able to afford these, and wealthy people may move in, or landlords buy up properties for high-cost rental. This is what has happened in Stratford, London, where the Olympics 2012 provided the catalyst for regenerating a rundown area with large sections of vacant land which experienced high levels of deprivation.

The view of those who can afford the homes is positive as they have convenient accommodation close to fast transport links into central London. However, the 450 former residents of Clay Lane housing cooperative are very upset as they were forced out of their homes by planning decisions and the new ones they were promised never happened. Wildlife groups' views are very positive as derelict and contaminated land had been left behind when the Docks closed but is now landscaped. Biodiversity has increased due to bat boxes and new wetland areas.

Examiner´s comments:

This response is awarded 6 marks. This answer has three clear groups with contrasting views, and these are explained and exemplified. It shows accurate and relevant understanding throughout and covers a range of ideas.