Photo AI
Question 3
Write an account of how trench warfare on the Western Front led to a war of attrition. [8 marks]
Step 1
Answer
Trench warfare, primarily seen on the Western Front during World War I, resulted in prolonged stalemates between opposing forces. The static nature of trenches created an environment where both sides were forced to dig in rather than advance, leading to excessive and relentless casualties without significant territorial gains.
The desire to break the deadlock caused each side to increasingly rely on firepower. Artillery barrages became the norm, intending to destroy enemy fortifications before an infantry assault. However, despite devastating bombardments, soldiers often found themselves facing strong defenses, leading to heavy losses. Thus, commanders realized that overwhelming force was needed to make any progress, contributing to the cycle of attrition as both sides sought to wear each other down rather than achieve a decisive victory.
Additionally, the introduction of new technologies, such as machine guns and poison gas, heightened the lethality of the battlefield. Defensive positions in trenches were often fortified, making it even harder for attacking troops to succeed, exacerbating the casualty rates. This environment of constant engagement and technological stalemate defined the war of attrition characteristic of the Western Front, as both sides aimed to outlast the other.
Step 2
Answer
The consequences of trench warfare went beyond mere statistics. The psychological impact on soldiers was profound, as they endured not only physical danger but also the horrors of life in muddy, disease-ridden trenches. Many soldiers suffered from what was known then as 'shell shock,' now understood as PTSD. This contributed to a loss of morale and an increased difficulty in maintaining fighting capability among troops.
Moreover, as the war dragged on, public perception began to shift. The initial enthusiasm for the war diminished, leading to increased anti-war sentiment in various nations. Governments faced pressure from citizens as the human cost continued to rise, resulting in social unrest and calls for peace. This evolving landscape placed additional strains on military strategies, as leaders were compelled to seek ways to end the conflict without capitulating.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered
Expansion: Opportunities and challenges
History - AQA
Conflict Across America
History - AQA
Consolidation: forging the nation
History - AQA
Germany and the growth of democracy
History - AQA
Germany and the Depression
History - AQA
The experiences of Germans under the Nazis
History - AQA
The end of Tsardom
History - AQA
Lenin’s new society
History - AQA
Stalin’s USSR
History - AQA
American People and the ‘Boom’
History - AQA
Bust - Americans’ experiences of the Depression and New Deal
History - AQA
Post-war America
History - AQA
The causes of the First World War
History - AQA
The First World War: stalemate
History - AQA
Ending the War
History - AQA
Peacemaking
History - AQA
The League of Nations and international peace
History - AQA
The origins and outbreak of the Second World War
History - AQA
The Origins of the Cold War
History - AQA
The development of the Cold War
History - AQA
Transformation of the Cold War
History - AQA
Conflict in Korea
History - AQA
Escalation of Conflict in Vietnam
History - AQA
The Ending of Conflict in Vietnam
History - AQA
Tensions in the Gulf
History - AQA
The war on Al-Qaeda
History - AQA
The Iraq War
History - AQA
Britain, Health and the people: C1000 to the present day
History - AQA
Germany, 1890–1945: Democracy and Dictatorship
History - AQA