Photo AI
'There was little change in the punishments used in the period 1250–1750.' How far do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. - OCR Gateway - GCSE History - Question 4 - 2019 - Paper 1
Question 4
'There was little change in the punishments used in the period 1250–1750.' How far do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.
Worked Solution & Example Answer:'There was little change in the punishments used in the period 1250–1750.' How far do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. - OCR Gateway - GCSE History - Question 4 - 2019 - Paper 1
Step 1
Introduction and Thesis Statement
Answer
In addressing the statement, it is necessary to analyze both the continuity and change in punishments from 1250 to 1750. While there were certain enduring characteristics in punitive measures, there were also significant developments, particularly in the context of the evolving social and legal landscape.
Step 2
Continuity in Punishments
Answer
Throughout the period, many traditional methods of punishment remained largely unchanged. For instance, corporal punishments such as whipping and branding were common and persistently enforced. The use of public humiliation through stocks and pillories also remained consistent, highlighting the reliance on visible punishment to deter crime and maintain social order.
Step 3
Changes in Punishments
Answer
However, the period did witness notable shifts. By the late 17th century, there was an emergent discourse surrounding the moral implications of certain punishments. For example, the rise of the Enlightenment brought forth ideas advocating for more humane treatment of offenders. Consequently, practices like execution began to attract criticism, leading to a decline in their use in favor of imprisonment and penal reform initiatives.
Step 4
Conclusion
Answer
In conclusion, while the statement holds some truth in recognizing the persistence of certain punishments, it overlooks the significant changes influenced by societal attitudes and emerging legal philosophies by the end of the period. Therefore, I partially agree with the statement, acknowledging both continuity and change in the punitive landscape.