Photo AI
In his book, The Battle of Hastings 1066, published in 2003, historian M.K - OCR - GCSE History (OCR B Schools History Project) - Question 9 - 2020 - Paper 1
Question 9
In his book, The Battle of Hastings 1066, published in 2003, historian M.K. Lawson argued that William was able to win the Battle of Hastings because of 'considerabl... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:In his book, The Battle of Hastings 1066, published in 2003, historian M.K - OCR - GCSE History (OCR B Schools History Project) - Question 9 - 2020 - Paper 1
Step 1
Discussion of Luck in William's Victory
Answer
William's victory at the Battle of Hastings can indeed be partially attributed to luck, as suggested by M.K. Lawson. For instance, the unexpected arrival of reinforcements from the north played a significant role. Additionally, Harold's forces were exhausted after their battles against the Norwegians and may not have been fully prepared for the subsequent confrontation against William.
Step 2
Analysis of Strategic Factors
Answer
However, it is also crucial to recognize the strategic planning that William employed. His choice of battlefield, the timing of the attack, and the effective use of cavalry and archers were carefully executed strategies that contributed to his success. The tactical deployment of his forces allowed him to exploit Harold's vulnerabilities effectively.
Step 3
Counterarguments and Conclusion
Answer
While luck played a role, it was not the sole factor in William's victory. The combination of luck, strategic preparation, and the command of resources must be considered collectively. Therefore, one could argue that while luck was significant, the meticulous preparation and execution of battle plans were equally, if not more, critical to securing victory in 1066.