Refer to Source 2A - NSC History - Question 2 - 2016 - Paper 1
Question 2
Refer to Source 2A.
2.1.1 Quote any TWO possible reasons from the source why the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale was the ‘turning point of the war’. (2 x 1)
2.1.2 Why, a... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Refer to Source 2A - NSC History - Question 2 - 2016 - Paper 1
Step 1
2.1.1 Quote any TWO possible reasons from the source why the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale was the ‘turning point of the war’.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The main goals of the war were achieved.
The South African forces withdrew, indicating a shift in military power.
Step 2
2.1.2 Why, according to General Geldenhuys, did the Soviet alliance lose the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale? Give TWO reasons for your answer.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The Soviet alliance was not unified and lacked coordination during the battle.
They underestimated the resolve and strategies of the opposing forces.
Step 3
2.1.3 Explain the term propaganda in the context of the outcome of the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Propaganda refers to the strategic communication aimed at influencing public perception. In this context, it was used to convey a narrative that shaped opinions about the battle's outcome, highlighting victories while downplaying losses.
Step 4
2.1.4 Comment on what you think was implied by the statement that the South Africans ‘won on the battlefield’, but ‘lost the crucial political battle’. Support your answer with relevant evidence.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This statement implies that although the South Africans may have achieved military objectives, they failed to secure long-term political influence. Evidence suggests that despite military success, political negotiations and international perceptions ultimately undermined their position, as seen in the shift towards diplomatic resolutions in the region.