Photo AI
Refer to Source 2A - NSC History - Question 2 - 2024 - Paper 2
Question 2
Refer to Source 2A. 2.1.1 Who, according to the source, was the head of South Africa's secret chemical and biological warfare project? 2.1.2 Explain the term amnes... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Refer to Source 2A - NSC History - Question 2 - 2024 - Paper 2
Step 1
Step 2
2.1.2 Explain the term amnesty in the context of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Answer
In the context of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, amnesty refers to a legal provision that allows individuals who have committed political crimes to testify about their actions without facing prosecution. The intention is to encourage honesty and transparency, enabling victims to learn the truth about human rights violations during the apartheid era.
Step 3
2.1.3 Why do you think Dr Wouter Basson refused to apply for amnesty?
Answer
Dr Wouter Basson likely refused to apply for amnesty because he may have believed that his actions were justified and in line with national security objectives. Additionally, he might have feared that applying for amnesty could lead to further scrutiny or revealing uncomfortable truths about his involvement in ethically questionable operations.
Step 4
2.1.4 List ANY FOUR findings in the source that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission found/uncovered about Project Coast.
Answer
- The TRC found that Project Coast had substantial funding and employed various laboratories to develop chemical and biological agents.
- It revealed that the operational strategies involved were secretive and involved deception.
- The commission identified specific instances of unethical human experimentation.
- The TRC also stated that the program had implications on regional stability and involved international collaboration.
Step 5
2.1.5 Comment on the implication of the statement, '... it (the TRC) found that the programme (CBW) would not have been possible without some level of international co-operation and support.'
Answer
The implication of this statement highlights the interconnectedness of South Africa's covert operations during apartheid and the broader international context. It suggests that countries or organizations outside South Africa may have been complicit or supportive of these illicit activities, raising questions about global accountability and the ethical responsibilities of other nations in human rights violations that occurred during this period.