Photo AI

Read the following passage - AQA - A-Level Biology - Question 10 - 2021 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 10

Read-the-following-passage-AQA-A-Level Biology-Question 10-2021-Paper 1.png

Read the following passage. Lake Malawi in East Africa has more species of fish than any other lake in the world. Many of these species have evolved from a common a... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Read the following passage - AQA - A-Level Biology - Question 10 - 2021 - Paper 1

Step 1

Lake Malawi in East Africa has more species of fish than any other lake in the world (line 1). Suggest and explain how this speciation may have occurred.

96%

114 rated

Answer

Speciation in Lake Malawi likely occurred due to the geographical isolation of fish populations resulting from the fluctuating water levels over millions of years. When the lake was smaller, subpopulations were separated, allowing for distinct evolutionary paths due to environmental pressures and ecological niches. Over time, these separate populations adapted to their unique habitats, leading to the emergence of new species. The concept of adaptive radiation explains this process, where species diversify rapidly to fill different ecological roles. Genetic divergence occurred, reinforcing the differences between populations.

Step 2

The percentage of forest cover in Malawi decreased between December 1990 and December 2016 (lines 9–10). Calculate the mean loss of forest cover in km² per week during this time period.

99%

104 rated

Answer

First, we need to calculate the area of forest cover in both years:

  • In December 1990: 41.4% of 94,800 km² = 0.414imes94,800extkm2=39,247.2extkm20.414 imes 94,800 ext{ km}^2 = 39,247.2 ext{ km}^2
  • In December 2016: 26.4% of 94,800 km² = 0.264imes94,800extkm2=25,107.2extkm20.264 imes 94,800 ext{ km}^2 = 25,107.2 ext{ km}^2

Next, we find the difference in forest cover:

39,247.2extkm225,107.2extkm2=14,140extkm239,247.2 ext{ km}^2 - 25,107.2 ext{ km}^2 = 14,140 ext{ km}^2

The time period from 1990 to 2016 is 26 years, or 26imes52=1,35226 imes 52 = 1,352 weeks.

Thus, the mean loss of forest cover per week is:

Mean loss per week=14,140 km21,352 weeks10.45 km2 per week\text{Mean loss per week} = \frac{14,140 \text{ km}^2}{1,352 \text{ weeks}} \approx 10.45 \text{ km}^2\text{ per week}

Step 3

Loss of nutrients into Lake Malawi has resulted in a decrease in some fish populations (lines 12–13). Explain why.

96%

101 rated

Answer

Nutrient loss into Lake Malawi leads to a decrease in fish populations primarily due to its impact on the ecosystem's food web. When soil erosion increases, it causes sedimentation and the loss of essential nutrients that algae and aquatic plants need for photosynthesis. A decrease in these primary producers results in less food availability for herbivorous fish, disrupting the entire food chain. Additionally, when nutrients are washed into the lake in high quantities, it can lead to algal blooms, which reduce oxygen levels in the water, creating a hypoxic environment where fish cannot thrive. Hence, decreased nutrient availability directly affects fish health and population dynamics.

Step 4

The mark-release-recapture method can be used to estimate the size of a fish population (lines 13–14). Explain how.

98%

120 rated

Answer

The mark-release-recapture method involves three key steps: First, a sample of fish is captured from the population, marked (using a non-toxic method), and then released back into the water. After allowing time for the marked fish to mix with the population, a second sample is captured. The number of marked fish in this second sample is counted. The population size can then be estimated using the formula:

N=(M×C)R\text{N} = \frac{(M \times C)}{R}

where N is the estimated population size, M is the number of marked fish in the first sample, C is the total number of fish captured in the second sample, and R is the number of marked fish recaptured. This method is effective as it gives an estimate of the population by using proportions, assuming random mixing of the marked and unmarked fish.

Step 5

Suggest why the mark-release-recapture method can produce unreliable results in very large lakes (lines 14–15).

97%

117 rated

Answer

The mark-release-recapture method can produce unreliable results in large lakes primarily due to the difficulty in ensuring that the marked fish distribute evenly throughout the population. In expansive areas, fish may cluster or remain in isolated pockets, leading to biases in sampling. Factors such as varying environmental conditions, heterogeneous habitats, and human activity can also affect fish behavior post-release. Additionally, if the capture technique is harmful or affects the survival of marked fish, this can lead to an underrepresentation of marked individuals in subsequent samplings, skewing results and leading to inaccurate population estimates.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;