Photo AI

Examine the two urban land use models from Hoyt and Burgess shown above - Leaving Cert Geography - Question 1 - 2008

Question icon

Question 1

Examine-the-two-urban-land-use-models-from-Hoyt-and-Burgess-shown-above-Leaving Cert Geography-Question 1-2008.png

Examine the two urban land use models from Hoyt and Burgess shown above. Explain two main differences between the two models. [40 marks]

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Examine the two urban land use models from Hoyt and Burgess shown above - Leaving Cert Geography - Question 1 - 2008

Step 1

Difference 1: Structure and Layout

96%

114 rated

Answer

The Hoyt Model, also known as the Sector Model, proposes that urban land uses develop in sectors or wedges radiating from the central business district (CBD). This results in a non-circular, more complex urban structure that accommodates transportation routes and land use demands. In contrast, the Burgess Model, or the Concentric Zone Model, depicts urban land usage as a series of concentric circles around the CBD. This model suggests a simpler, radial growth of urban areas, with distinct zones for different socio-economic classes.

Step 2

Difference 2: Social Stratification

99%

104 rated

Answer

In the Hoyt Model, social stratification is reflected in how different classes spread out along the transport routes, with high-class residential areas located further from industrial zones. This illustrates a more dynamic approach to urban growth where socio-economic groups are shaped by transportation accessibility. On the other hand, the Burgess Model presents a more rigid social structure, indicating that wealthier populations inhabit the outer zones while lower-income groups reside closer to the city center. This suggests a fixed urban stratification based on distance from the CBD.

Join the Leaving Cert students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;