Context & Writer's Techniques (AQA A-Level English Literature A): Revision Notes
Context & Writer's Techniques
Introduction to the play
Timberlake Wertenbaker's play premiered in 1988 at London's Royal Court Theatre. The drama explores the First Fleet's arrival in New South Wales in 1788, where convicted criminals were transported to establish a new colony. At the heart of the story is Lieutenant Ralph Clark's ambitious decision to stage George Farquhar's comedy The Recruiting Officer with the convicts, adapting it from Thomas Keneally's novel The Playmaker. This theatrical experiment becomes a vehicle for examining questions about punishment, reform, and human dignity.
The play draws on actual historical events, blending theatrical innovation with historical accuracy to create a powerful commentary on justice, transformation, and the human capacity for change.
Historical context
The setting and its significance
The play takes place in Sydney Cove following the arrival of British ships in 1787, a period marked by severe social problems in Britain. The country faced an overcrowding crisis in its prisons, which led to the policy of transportation—sending convicted criminals to distant colonies as a form of punishment and population control.
Transportation as Colonial Policy
Transportation served dual purposes: it relieved Britain's prison overcrowding while simultaneously providing labour to establish and maintain distant colonies. This policy would continue for decades, fundamentally shaping Australian history.
Georgian society and class divisions
Wertenbaker presents a deeply stratified Georgian society where social class determined treatment and prospects. The play examines how petty thieves and sex workers received brutal punishment, whilst the upper classes debated philosophical questions about the purpose of punishment. This class division is central to understanding the tensions within the play.
Understanding Class Tensions
The stark contrast between the treatment of different social classes isn't just historical background—it's the fundamental conflict that drives the entire play. The officers debate theory whilst convicts experience brutal reality, creating dramatic irony throughout.
The rehabilitation debate
Governor Arthur Phillip represents progressive thinking for his time through his real-life experiments with civility and rehabilitation. His approach contrasts sharply with the violent methods of flogging and hanging favoured by other officers. This reflects genuine historical debates about whether criminals could be reformed or should simply be punished.
Key term: Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation refers to the process of helping criminals reform and reintegrate into society, rather than simply punishing them for their crimes. This concept was revolutionary in the 18th century and remains contested today.
Aboriginal presence and colonial violence
The play acknowledges the Aboriginal witness to colonial violence and the foregrounding of this brutal reality. This element connects the historical context to broader questions about empire and oppression.
The inclusion of Aboriginal perspectives, though limited by the play's colonial viewpoint, serves as a crucial reminder that the "empty land" narrative was a fiction—the colony was established through dispossession and violence against existing inhabitants.
Contemporary relevance
The 1980s premiere during the Thatcher era deliberately echoed contemporary prison reform debates. Wertenbaker uses the historical setting to comment on her own time, demonstrating theatre's power to address social issues through historical parallel.
Literary context
Epic theatre and Brechtian influence
Wertenbaker employs techniques from epic theatre, particularly the Brechtian Verfremdungseffekt (alienation effect). This approach aims to prevent audiences from becoming emotionally absorbed in the story, instead encouraging critical thinking about social and political issues.
Key term: Verfremdungseffekt
Verfremdungseffekt (or alienation effect) is a technique that reminds audiences they are watching a performance, not reality. This creates emotional distance, allowing viewers to think critically about the themes rather than simply feeling for the characters.
This German term, coined by Bertolt Brecht, literally means "making strange" or "distancing effect"—the audience should feel intellectually engaged but emotionally distanced.
Blending historical sources
The play functions as an epic history play that combines multiple sources. Wertenbaker draws from Keneally's novel, actual journals kept by First Fleet officers, and historical records. She also incorporates dialogue directly from Farquhar's The Recruiting Officer, creating layers of textual reference.
This layering of sources creates a rich intertextual tapestry—audiences familiar with The Recruiting Officer will catch additional ironies and parallels, while those new to it still experience the dramatic power of the embedded performance.
Feminist postcolonial perspective
Wertenbaker's Joint Stock workshop training influenced her innovative approach. The play examines empire and its underclass through a feminist and postcolonial lens, questioning power structures and giving voice to marginalised characters. This critical perspective was characteristic of theatre in the post-Cloud Nine era, referencing Caryl Churchill's influential work.
The Joint Stock Theatre Company was known for its collaborative creation process and politically engaged work. Wertenbaker's training there shaped her approach to giving voice to marginalized characters and examining power structures through theatre.
Metatheatrical elements
The play is inherently metatheatrical—it's a play about putting on a play. This self-reflexive structure allows Wertenbaker to explore theatre's civilising and transformative power whilst simultaneously questioning its limitations.
Writer's techniques
Multi-role epic casting
Wertenbaker deliberately structures the play for a small ensemble cast, with over thirty characters performed by just ten actors. This casting choice serves multiple dramatic purposes:
-
Creates Brechtian alienation: When actors visibly switch between roles, audiences remain aware they're watching a performance. The fluidity prevents emotional identification with individual characters.
-
Blurs actor and character boundaries: The technique metatheatrically mirrors the play's central conceit—just as convicts transform into theatrical characters when performing The Recruiting Officer, so too do the actors transform before our eyes.
-
Reflects thematic concerns: The doubling of convicts, officers, and Aboriginal characters suggests uncomfortable parallels between different groups. An actor might play both oppressor and oppressed, highlighting how circumstances rather than inherent nature determine behaviour.
-
Practical and symbolic: Ralph Clark's rehearsal diary functions as a framing device, drawing attention to the theatrical construction whilst advancing the narrative.
Theatrical Transformation: The Actor as Multiple Characters
Consider how an actor playing both an officer who orders a flogging and a convict who receives punishment creates a powerful dramatic statement. The audience watches the same physical person embody oppressor and oppressed, forcing them to confront the arbitrary nature of power and the thin line between different social positions.
This technique makes the famous line, "We left our country, for our country's good," take on multiple meanings—questioning who "we" refers to and whose "good" is being served.
Juxtaposition/montage
Wertenbaker alternates contrasting scenes to create powerful dramatic effects and thematic connections:
-
Harsh reality versus theatrical hope: Short, brutal scenes depicting the colony's violence (floggings, hangings, desperate survival) alternate with scenes from The Recruiting Officer rehearsals and performances. This contrast emphasises both the horror of the convicts' circumstances and the redemptive possibility that theatre offers.
-
Debates interrupt rehearsals: The Governor and officers hold philosophical debates about punishment and rehabilitation. When these discussions interrupt or frame the rehearsal scenes, Wertenbaker highlights the gap between theoretical debate and lived reality.
-
Comic relief with dark undertones: Rehearsal scenes often contain comedy, particularly as convicts struggle with unfamiliar theatrical language and conventions. However, this humour is always shadowed by the brutality of their circumstances, preventing audiences from forgetting the stakes.
Epic Theatre's Rejection of Naturalism
This technique exemplifies epic theatre's rejection of smooth, naturalistic progression. The fragmented structure forces audiences to make intellectual connections between scenes rather than following a comfortable emotional journey. Audiences must actively think about how the scenes relate rather than passively experiencing an emotional story.
Embedded play/intertextuality
The play-within-a-play structure creates multiple layers of meaning:
-
Tragic comedy: Farquhar's comedy is nested within Wertenbaker's tragedy, creating ironic parallels. The convicts recite recruitment lines that mirror their own exploitation—they've been recruited to build a colony just as soldiers are recruited for war.
-
Character parallels: Silvia's cross-dressing in The Recruiting Officer echoes Mary Brenham's defiance and Liz Morden's rebellion against authority. These connections suggest that the theatrical roles allow convicts to explore aspects of themselves.
-
Self-reflexive exploration: The prologue describes theatre as a "humanising force," and the play tests this claim. Does performing in a play actually transform the convicts, or is this theatrical redemption merely another form of exploitation?
-
Intertextual dialogue: By quoting extensively from Farquhar's text, Wertenbaker creates a conversation between 18th-century comedy and 20th-century political theatre. The historical play comments on both its setting and its own moment of creation.
Key term: Intertextuality
Intertextuality refers to the relationship between different texts. Here, Wertenbaker's play and Farquhar's play interact, with each gaining new meaning from the other. The Restoration comedy takes on darker meanings when performed by real convicts, while Wertenbaker's play gains depth through the parallel situations.
Dialectal vernacular/idiolects
Language differences reveal and reinforce social hierarchies throughout the play:
-
Convict speech: Characters like Dabby Bryant use vivid, colloquial language filled with slang and profanity. Her "Bloody oath!" exclamation exemplifies the raw, direct speech patterns that mark her as working class. This vernacular speech is energetic and expressive, suggesting vitality despite oppression.
-
Officer's educated diction: The officers speak in formal, grammatically correct English. Their vocabulary and sentence structure mark them as educated and therefore superior in the social hierarchy. This linguistic difference isn't just descriptive—it actively creates and maintains class boundaries.
-
Aboriginal silence: The Aboriginal characters are described using terms like "silent" and speaking in "monologic asides." Their question, "What are these pale ghosts doing?" emphasises their dispossession. They lack translation or voice in the colonial system, lamenting their loss without the colonisers truly hearing or understanding them.
-
Language as barrier and bridge: The convicts initially struggle with Farquhar's formal theatrical language, but gradually master it. This linguistic journey represents their transformation, though Wertenbaker questions whether learning the oppressor's language truly liberates them.
Key term: Idiolect
Idiolect refers to the unique speech patterns of an individual or group, including vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation choices. In this play, idiolects serve as audible markers of social class and power dynamics.
Non-chronological framing
Wertenbaker rejects straightforward chronological storytelling in favour of a more complex temporal structure:
-
Prologue and performance: The play opens with a flogging scene set on a ship, then moves to the performance triumph, before working backwards and forwards through rehearsals and colony life. This fragmented approach creates thematic unity rather than linear narrative.
-
Storm motif: Weather and natural imagery unify disparate scenes, with storms representing both literal danger and metaphorical chaos. The transformation from chaos to order parallels the convicts' journey.
-
Chorus-like transitions: Convict characters sometimes function collectively, narrating transitions or commenting on action. This epic technique breaks naturalistic illusion and fragments linear time.
-
Epic fragmentation: Rather than following cause-and-effect logic, scenes are arranged thematically. This structure reflects epic theatre's goal of encouraging analytical rather than emotional engagement. Audiences must actively construct meaning from fragmented scenes rather than passively following a story.
The non-linear structure also mirrors the disorientation of transportation itself—characters are literally and figuratively displaced from their expected life trajectories. The fragmented timeline reflects the psychological experience of being torn from one's homeland and deposited in an unknown world.
Summary
Key Points to Remember:
-
Historical context matters: Understanding 1788 transportation, Georgian class divisions, and the rehabilitation debate helps explain character motivations and thematic concerns. The play deliberately connects historical questions to contemporary 1980s debates.
-
Brechtian techniques dominate: Wertenbaker uses alienation effects throughout—multi-role casting, juxtaposition, non-chronological structure—to prevent emotional absorption and encourage critical thinking about justice and reform.
-
The play-within-a-play is central: The Recruiting Officer isn't just decoration; it creates ironic parallels with the convicts' situation and allows Wertenbaker to explore whether theatre can genuinely transform people or merely provides another form of control.
-
Language reveals power: Different characters' speech patterns—convict vernacular, officer's formal diction, Aboriginal silence—demonstrate how language constructs and maintains social hierarchies in colonial society.
-
Form reflects content: The fragmented, non-linear structure mirrors the convicts' disorientation whilst also employing epic theatre techniques to make audiences think rather than just feel about questions of punishment and human dignity.