Interventions in the Balkans (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
Interventions in the Balkans
Background: the fragmentation of Yugoslavia
Following the death of Yugoslavia's leader, Josip Broz Tito, in 1980, internal tensions within the country intensified rapidly. The Yugoslav state had been held together by Tito's authority, but his passing exposed deep ethnic and political divisions among the six constituent republics.
In Kosovo, the Albanian Muslim majority began pressing for their province to be granted the status of a full member republic rather than remaining part of Serbia, which had an overall Orthodox Christian majority. This demand directly challenged Serbia's territorial integrity and political dominance within Yugoslavia.
The tension in Kosovo reflected a fundamental distinction within Yugoslavia's structure: Kosovo was an autonomous province within Serbia, not a full member republic. This lower status became a major point of contention as Albanian Muslims, who formed the majority in Kosovo, sought equal standing with the six republics.
Slobodan Milošević, who led Serbia, responded by demanding greater powers for his republic, positioning Serbia as the largest and most populous of the six republics. Meanwhile, Slovenia and Croatia elected governments that advocated for increased autonomy from the Yugoslav federation. Serbs living in Croatia grew increasingly anxious about their position, fearing they would become a vulnerable minority within an independent or more autonomous Croatia, potentially reversing their previous majority status within united Yugoslavia.
The question of genocide and ethnic cleansing
Critical Definitions:
Genocide refers to the deliberate attempt to destroy an entire ethnic group, targeting individuals not for their actions but solely because of their ethnicity.
Ethnic cleansing describes the systematic removal of all members of an ethnic group from a specific territory, whether through forced exile or murder.
These terms are distinct but related: genocide focuses on destruction of the group itself, while ethnic cleansing focuses on removal from territory (though it may include murder as a method).
American officials concluded that Bosnian Serbs, working alongside the Serbian government and military, were conducting a campaign of genocide (referred to in the Yugoslav context as ethnic cleansing) against non-Serb populations. The objective was to eliminate or expel non-Serbs from areas where Serbs formed a majority, thereby allowing those parts of Bosnia to secede and merge with an enlarged Serbia.
This interpretation gained support from senior British political figures across the spectrum: former Conservative leader Margaret Thatcher, Liberal Party leader Paddy Ashdown, and former Labour leader Michael Foot all accepted this analysis. Tony Blair would later adopt the same position when he became Labour leader and then Prime Minister.
Initial international response: non-intervention
Despite the gravity of the situation, many countries chose not to intervene, treating the conflicts as internal Yugoslav matters. The United Nations initially regarded these developments as domestic problems that fell outside its remit. This position persisted until 1999, when the UN revised its analysis of the situation.
Prime Minister John Major and Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd maintained this policy of non-intervention, even as reports emerged documenting serious crimes being committed in the region. These accounts described atrocities unprecedented in Europe since the Second World War. Major and Hurd kept Britain out of the conflict despite the mounting evidence of human rights violations.
American President George H.W. Bush (father of a later President, George W. Bush) and his successor from 1993, Bill Clinton, attempted to build international support for intervention in Bosnia's crisis. Britain opposed this initiative. The violence continued while British negotiators worked actively to prevent British involvement in any military action.
The shift towards intervention
Two developments altered this trajectory of non-intervention.
First, central negotiations about Yugoslavia's future were overtaken by unilateral regional decisions. In 1991, Croatia and Slovenia declared their independence from Yugoslavia, followed by Macedonia. The following year, 1992, Bosnia-Herzegovina declared its independence, though this new state still included Kosovo and Montenegro within what remained of Serbia. Four of the former Yugoslav republics now gained recognition as independent states.
Understanding the Timeline:
The sequence of independence declarations was crucial to the international response:
- 1991: Croatia and Slovenia declare independence, followed by Macedonia
- 1992: Bosnia-Herzegovina declares independence
- These declarations transformed the conflict from an "internal matter" to an international crisis involving newly recognized sovereign states
Second, war erupted in Bosnia involving both Serbian and Croatian military forces. This development transformed the situation into something in which other countries and the UN could legitimately claim an interest, as it was no longer purely an internal Yugoslav matter. Reports that Bosnians had been murdered in substantial numbers by Serb forces became a catalyst for action. A NATO bombing campaign commenced in 1995, targeting Bosnian Serb forces.
The Dayton Agreement and peacekeeping
The stated aim of NATO intervention was to prevent Bosnia from being partitioned, thereby blocking Serbia from annexing Serb-majority areas to create a 'Greater Serbia'. A peacekeeping force took up positions in 1995-96 to enforce the Dayton Agreement, a peace settlement that formally ended the Bosnian War. John Major signed this agreement as a representative of Britain, alongside leaders from the United States, France, Germany and Russia.
The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing:
The maps of ethnic distribution in Bosnia-Herzegovina reveal the dramatic impact of the conflict:
- Before the war (1991): The three main groups (Bosnians, Serbs and Croats) were interspersed throughout much of the territory, with complex patterns of settlement
- After the war (1998): The ethnic groups had become far more geographically separated, with clearer zones of Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian dominance
This geographical separation was a direct result of the ethnic cleansing campaigns that prompted international intervention.
Key figure: Slobodan Milošević
Slobodan Milošević served as the leader of Serbia during this period. He demanded greater powers for Serbia within Yugoslavia and later pursued policies that supported Serb populations outside Serbia's borders. His actions and those of forces aligned with him were identified by international observers as constituting genocide against non-Serb populations in Bosnia. Milošević's policies contributed directly to the wars that followed Yugoslavia's breakup and to the ethnic cleansing campaigns that prompted international intervention.
Key Points to Remember:
- Yugoslavia fragmented after Tito's death in 1980, with ethnic tensions escalating between different groups, particularly in Kosovo, Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina
- The British government under Major and Hurd initially refused to intervene despite evidence of genocide and ethnic cleansing by Bosnian Serb forces against non-Serb populations
- Two factors changed the situation: regional declarations of independence (Croatia and Slovenia in 1991, Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1992) and the outbreak of war in Bosnia involving Serbian and Croatian forces
- NATO launched a bombing campaign in 1995 targeting Bosnian Serb forces after reports of mass killings, marking a shift from non-intervention to military action
- The Dayton Agreement (1995-96) established a peacekeeping force to prevent partition and enforce peace, with Major signing alongside US, French, German and Russian leaders