The Position of Women (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Position of Women
Introduction: Change and continuity in the 20th century
Throughout the 20th century, women's lives underwent substantial transformation in both public and private spheres. However, historians must exercise caution when assessing the pace and scope of these changes. While legislative reforms and shifting social attitudes brought undeniable progress, deeply embedded patterns of inequality persisted in many areas of British life.
A Balanced Historical Perspective
When studying women's history in the 20th century, it's crucial to avoid two extremes: dismissing the real progress that occurred, or overstating the rate and extent of change. Many areas saw formal legal equality established without corresponding practical equality in daily life.
Understanding Feminism
Feminism refers to a socio-political movement based on the recognition that women have historically been denied equal social, economic, political and cultural freedoms compared to men. Feminist activists and theorists have worked both to challenge this unequal state of affairs and to analyse the underlying causes of women's subordination.
Legislative advances and persistent barriers
Voting rights and political participation
Early 20th century legislation granted women formal political equality with men. The 1918 Representation of the People Act extended the franchise to women over 30 who met property qualifications, whilst the 1928 Equal Franchise Act lowered the voting age for women to 21, matching men's voting age. These reforms meant women could vote in national and local elections on the same basis as men, and could stand as parliamentary candidates.
The Gap Between Rights and Reality
Despite legal equality in voting rights, women faced substantial obstacles entering Parliament. Selection committees within political parties demonstrated a marked preference for male candidates, making it extremely difficult for women to secure nominations for winnable constituencies. This institutional bias created a significant gap between women's formal rights and their actual representation in the House of Commons.
Employment discrimination
The 1970s brought legislation designed to eliminate gender-based discrimination in the workplace. Employers could no longer legally pay different wages to men and women performing identical work. This established the principle of equal pay for comparable roles.
However, the practical application of this principle proved problematic. Men and women often performed different types of work within organisations, making direct comparisons difficult. Courts and tribunals spent considerable time hearing cases that attempted to establish whether particular jobs constituted "comparable work", testing the boundaries of equal pay legislation.
The persistent pay gap
At the start of the 1970s, women's average earnings stood at approximately 50% of men's pay. This figure represented a substantial wage disparity that disadvantaged women across the economy. During the 1970s and early 1980s, women's relative earnings improved steadily, reaching about 60% of men's pay by the early 1980s.
Trade unions played an important role in securing these pay increases. Rising female membership of unions meant that women's pay demands received greater attention during wage negotiations. However, progress slowed markedly after this initial improvement, with women's average pay stalling at roughly two-thirds that of men.
The Stalled Progress
This plateau suggested that whilst the most blatant forms of discrimination had been challenged, more subtle structural inequalities continued to limit women's earning potential. The pay gap became stuck at approximately two-thirds, revealing the limits of legislative change alone.
Factors Limiting Women's Earnings
Several factors help explain why women's pay remained stuck at this level:
- More women worked part-time hours
- More women reduced their working hours to accommodate childcare responsibilities
- More women took career breaks or left employment entirely for family reasons
These patterns reflected broader social expectations about women's primary responsibility for domestic life and childcare, which continued to shape employment decisions.
Tax reform and individualisation
During the 1980s, Chancellor Nigel Lawson introduced reforms to the taxation system that had implications for how married couples were treated. Previously, married partners had been assessed as a single economic unit for tax purposes, with husbands responsible for submitting their wives' tax returns alongside their own.
Lawson's changes moved towards treating marriage partners as separate individuals for taxation. Each person became responsible for their own tax return, regardless of marital status.
The Significance of Tax Reform
This shift, though seemingly technical, reflected the government's broader ideological emphasis on individual responsibility rather than collective or family units. It also symbolised a small but meaningful step towards recognising women as independent economic actors rather than dependents within a household.
Access to higher education
The 1980s witnessed important changes in women's access to university education. Newer universities established during the post-war expansion had operated on co-educational principles from their founding, admitting both men and women as students.
However, Oxford and Cambridge, the oldest and most prestigious universities, had maintained single-sex colleges for men. During this period, these ancient institutions began opening their doors to women applicants. Oxford and Cambridge colleges gradually admitted women, creating a more gender-balanced student body at institutions that had historically excluded them. This development improved women's access to elite educational credentials and the career opportunities associated with them.
Women in politics: The Thatcher years
Margaret Thatcher's election as Prime Minister in 1979 represented a remarkable achievement. She became the first woman to lead a major British political party and to hold the office of Prime Minister. Her political longevity and dominance of the 1980s demonstrated that a woman could succeed at the highest levels of British politics.
The Thatcher Paradox
Despite this personal success, Thatcher showed minimal interest in advancing other women's political careers or promoting feminist causes. She appointed only a small number of women to government positions during her lengthy tenure as Prime Minister. Only one woman received elevation to the Cabinet, and she was a member of the House of Lords rather than the Commons.
This pattern led critics to argue that Thatcher, having achieved power herself, had done little to help other women follow in her path.
Thatcher's personal background as a lower-middle-class woman who attended state schools rather than elite private institutions and who never went to university distinguished her from many male Conservative politicians. She had experienced rejection (being turned down for a bus conductor position) and unemployment, giving her a different perspective from upper-middle-class men who dominated much of the Conservative Party establishment.
John Major, who succeeded Thatcher as Prime Minister, demonstrated a somewhat greater willingness to promote women within government, appointing two women to his Cabinet.
Gender and voting behaviour
In the decades following the Second World War, a clear gender gap emerged in voting patterns. Women consistently showed a greater tendency to vote Conservative than men did. This pattern persisted across multiple elections and became a recognised feature of British electoral politics.
The Shift in Voting Patterns
Interestingly, this gender gap in voting behaviour diminished during Thatcher's time as Conservative leader. Women became only as likely as men to support the Conservative Party, not more so. This shift suggests that Thatcher's gender did not translate into increased female support for her party. The reasons for this change remain complex and contested among historians and political scientists.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The 20th century brought substantial changes to women's legal rights and social positions, but the pace of change should not be overstated, as many inequalities persisted.
-
Formal legal equality in voting (1918, 1928) and employment (1970s) did not automatically translate into practical equality in parliamentary representation or workplace pay.
-
Women's average earnings rose from 50% of men's pay in the early 1970s to 60% by the early 1980s, largely due to trade union activism, but then stalled at approximately two-thirds of men's pay.
-
Margaret Thatcher's achievement as Britain's first female Prime Minister was admirable but did not lead to a broader transformation in women's political representation; she promoted few women to senior positions.
-
Tax reforms under Nigel Lawson shifted towards treating individuals rather than married couples as the unit of taxation, reflecting a broader emphasis on individualism over family or household units.