Social Relevance of Christianity (AQA A-Level Religious Studies): Revision Notes
Social relevance of Christianity
Introduction to social relevance
Christianity responds to increasing secularisation by demonstrating that it remains socially relevant in contemporary society. This involves showing that Christian teachings and actions can engage meaningfully with people's lives and bring about positive change.
To establish social relevance, Christianity must demonstrate three key elements:
- Teachings engagement: Christian teachings can connect with the lives of people in society today
- Actions engagement: The actions of Christians can make a practical difference to people's lives
- Working for change: Both teachings and actions can bring about transformation within society
These three elements work together to show how Christianity maintains relevance in an increasingly secular world. Each element addresses a different aspect of engagement: intellectual connection through teachings, practical impact through actions, and transformative power through sustained change.
Political dimensions of social relevance
Social relevance naturally implies political relevance because politics concerns how society is organised and the values that shape communal life. Christianity therefore engages not just with individual spiritual matters but with broader questions of social order and justice.
Individual transformation vs social conformity
Within Evangelical and House Church traditions, there is strong emphasis on the transforming power of the Christian gospel. This approach focuses on how:
- Individual lives are changed through becoming Christian
- People adopt Christian beliefs and values
- At an individual level, transformation occurs
- At a social level, Christians generally conform to existing norms
This pattern reflects the shift in religion's status from something imposed by the state to a matter of individual choice. However, this trend towards individuality has not been uniform. In some contexts, such as during the Troubles in Northern Ireland or where Christians form a minority, church membership has become a marker of political loyalty.
Quietist vs activist approaches
Christians hold differing views on how to respond to secularisation, creating a fundamental debate about the church's role in society.
The quietist position
If Christianity is primarily about 'another world' (the Kingdom of Heaven contrasted with 'this world'), then:
- There is a tendency to accept the sinful and distorted nature of society
- Everything can be left in God's hands
- Christians should not engage in social or political action
- The focus remains on spiritual matters
The Quietist Approach
The quietist position emphasises withdrawal from worldly concerns and focuses on personal salvation and spiritual development. This approach sees the Kingdom of Heaven as fundamentally separate from earthly society, leading to minimal engagement with social or political issues.
The activist position
If the 'Kingdom' is something Christians are meant to build and live out in this world, then:
- There is likely to be far more critical engagement with society
- Direct attempts are made to change society
- The Gospel and Christian moral order require action
- Individuals and churches must engage with the world
- Particular attention goes to helping those who are sick or poor
- This may involve direct social and political action
The Activist Approach
The activist position sees the Kingdom of God as something to be realised on earth through Christian action. This approach demands critical examination of society's structures and active work to transform them according to Christian values of justice and compassion.
Key Distinction
The fundamental difference between quietist and activist approaches lies in their understanding of the Kingdom of God:
- Quietists see it as primarily otherworldly and spiritual
- Activists see it as something to be built and lived out in this world
This distinction shapes how Christians engage (or don't engage) with social and political issues.
Secular ownership of Christianity
Even as church attendance declines, many people who do not attend services still feel attached to local church buildings. This attachment can indicate that society is less secular than simple attendance figures suggest.
Reasons for attachment
People maintain connections to church buildings because they:
- Represent places where they or relatives were married or buried
- Provide a sense of permanence and continuity
- Serve as focal points during times of need or local tragedy
- Offer spaces for celebration
- May defend buildings threatened with closure
International examples
Church buildings can express national and religious identity:
Examples of Church Buildings as National Symbols
- Russian Orthodox Church: Grew in importance after the fall of communist regime in the Soviet Union (post-1989)
- Poland: Catholicism revived to express Polish identity after persecution under Soviet rule
- Finland: Protestant Cathedral and Orthodox Church both express religious traditions
- General pattern: Where churches have been identified with the state since the Reformation, they maintain symbolic importance
Christianity as a secularising religion
Christianity can be understood as a naturally secularising religion because:
- Jesus taught that caring for the poor and healing the sick (both secular operations) take priority over obedience to religious rules
- Secular vocations of teaching and healing have become separated from organised religion
- This separation represents a form of secularisation that aligns with a radical interpretation of Christianity's earliest message
This perspective suggests that Christianity's engagement with secular issues isn't merely a response to secularisation, but may be intrinsic to the faith itself. Jesus's teaching prioritised practical care for people over strict adherence to religious rules, potentially making Christianity a religion that naturally moves beyond purely religious concerns.
Liberation theology
Origins and key figures
Liberation theology emerged in Latin America as a response to poverty and oppression. Key theologians include:
- Gustavo Gutiérrez (b. 1928): Pioneered liberation theology in Latin America
- Leonardo Boff (b. 1938): Developed theological basis for social action
Core principles
Liberationist: An approach to theology that starts with an analysis of the situation of the poor and oppressed, and then uses the gospel as a way to challenge the causes of their poverty and oppression.
Liberation theologians argued that:
- Christians should act in secular society on behalf of the poor and oppressed
- This might involve becoming active in education, trade unions, political parties
- In extreme circumstances, revolutionary movements could be justified
- The movement was inspired by the actions of Jesus described in the New Testament
Practical engagement
Liberation theology started from:
- Practical engagement with poverty and political action
- A necessary secularising of the gospel to make it relevant to ordinary working people's lives
- Education to help people recognise the difference between their own lives and real justice as described in the gospel
- Finding ways to challenge oppressive forces
The fundamental split
A major division developed concerning the church's role:
Two Competing Visions
Liberationists: Wanted to change society to promote justice and give power to the poor and powerless. They saw this as the natural and practical application of Jesus's teaching.
Traditionalists: Believed the primary concern of the church was to support the poor by offering spiritual aid to individuals.
This debate centred on whether the church should:
- Engage with the secular world of social injustice and politics, or
- Offer only spiritual help, bringing individuals into a new relationship with God
Criticism
The movement faced severe criticism, particularly from the Pope, who believed:
- The presentation of Jesus as a political revolutionary was not true to the gospel
- It contradicted the teachings of the church
- The approach was too politically radical
However, this was never a complete either/or choice. Liberationists did not deny the value of spirituality, and traditionalists did not deny concerns about exploitation and poverty. The difference lay in balance and methods of working.
Oscar Romero (1917-80)
Worked Example: Liberation Theology in Action
Archbishop Oscar Romero exemplified liberation theology in practice:
- Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Salvador
- Assassinated while saying Mass on 24 March 1980
- The previous day, he called on government soldiers, as Christians, to stop carrying out repression and human rights violations
- Regularly spoke out in favour of the poor during El Salvador's deteriorating political situation
- His death gave worldwide publicity to the situation in El Salvador and the church's position on poverty and injustice
Romero's life demonstrates how liberation theology moves from theory to practice: he didn't just teach about justice for the poor, but actively challenged oppressive structures, ultimately paying with his life. His martyrdom shows both the power and the danger of the liberationist approach.
Faith in the City: liberationist approach in Britain
Background and purpose
In 1985, the archbishops of the Church of England commissioned research into life, conditions and faith in inner cities. The resulting report, Faith in the City: A Call to Action by Church and Nation, revealed:
- High levels of poverty in inner city areas
- Whole communities felt powerless when concentrated poverty existed
- Poverty was measured using six factors: unemployment, overcrowding, households lacking basic amenities, pensioners living alone, ethnic origin, single parent households
Urban Priority Areas: Places experiencing the highest levels of poverty
This term was used in the report to identify specific areas requiring focused attention and resources from both the church and government.
Key recommendations
The report recommended to the Church of England:
- Parishes in these areas should have more clergy
- Extra attention to training clergy and lay people
- Churches should consider how worship was conducted
- Extend and improve work with children and young people
- Use buildings more effectively for secular community needs, not just religious services
The report also made specific recommendations to the government concerning:
- Employment law
- Housing legislation
- Income support and social benefits
- Access to legal advice and support
By addressing these secular issues alongside spiritual concerns, the report engaged with people's whole existence, not just their spiritual life. This represented a liberationist approach applied to the British inner city context.
Reception and impact
Church response: Faith in the City was widely welcomed within the Church of England
Government response: The Conservative government largely responded negatively:
- Saw recommendations as politically left-wing
- One minister dismissed it as 'pure Marxist theology'
- Argued people should help themselves rather than depend on state support
Practical outcomes:
- Led to founding of the Church Urban Fund
- Fund made grants to groups working in secular and religious organisations
- Tackled inner city poverty and powerlessness
- Changed how the Church of England worked in cities, especially areas of inner city poverty
Subsequent developments
- 1990: Similar report commissioned into church in rural areas (Faith in the Countryside)
- 1997: Methodist Church commissioned The Cities
- Current practice: Now normal for churches in Britain to take a liberationist approach
- Most parish and Methodist churches are used for worship and secular purposes
- Priests and ministers have pastoral roles extending beyond spiritual care
- Many churches run food banks, drop-in centres and community care activities
This liberationist approach sees the church responding to secularisation by taking responsibility for community well-being in secular as well as religious matters. Rather than withdrawing from society, churches have become more deeply engaged with practical community needs.
Exam tips
Exam Preparation Guidelines
- Be prepared to explain the difference between quietist and activist approaches with clear examples
- Understand how liberation theology applies both in Latin American and British contexts
- Know the three criteria for demonstrating social relevance (teachings, actions, change)
- Be able to discuss whether Christianity's engagement with secular issues represents a response to secularisation or part of Christianity's essential nature
- Consider both supportive and critical perspectives on liberationist approaches
Remember!
Key Points to Remember
- Christianity demonstrates social relevance through three elements: teachings engagement, actions engagement and working for change
- The quietist approach focuses on spiritual matters and leaving things in God's hands, whilst the activist approach emphasises practical engagement with social issues
- Liberation theology originated in Latin America, arguing Christians should act on behalf of the poor and oppressed, inspired by Jesus's example
- Oscar Romero exemplified liberation theology, speaking out for the poor and being assassinated for his stance
- Faith in the City (1985) applied liberationist principles to British inner cities, leading to practical changes in how churches work with communities
- Christianity can be seen as a naturally secularising religion, as Jesus prioritised caring for the poor and healing the sick over religious rules