1597 Parliament (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
1597 Parliament
Context: growing parliamentary tensions
By the late 1590s, tensions between Elizabeth I and the House of Commons were increasing. Earlier parliaments had shown signs of growing confidence among MPs, particularly over issues of taxation and royal privileges. The 1593 parliament had seen disputes over taxation levels and the rights of the Commons to initiate tax bills without interference from the Lords. These earlier tensions set the stage for more serious criticism in 1597.
Understanding Parliamentary Tools: Petition vs Bill
A key distinction MPs understood was the difference between a petition and a bill:
- A petition was a document addressed directly to the monarch, requesting action on a particular issue. The monarch could choose whether to act on it.
- A bill, by contrast, could change the law or limit the royal prerogative (the monarch's exclusive powers).
Using a petition was therefore a less confrontational approach than introducing a bill into parliament.
The 1597 parliament: first direct criticism
Background: a deteriorating situation
The parliament that met in 1597 took place against a backdrop of serious problems. The social and economic situation in England had declined dramatically since the early 1590s. Several factors created anxiety:
- The war with Spain was continuing, bringing increased fears of invasion
- Tyrone's rebellion in Ireland had recently broken out, creating another military crisis
- Economic hardship was affecting many people across the country
These pressures meant that Elizabeth needed to summon parliament to grant taxation, but they also made MPs more willing to voice complaints about government policies.
Francis Moore and the monopolies debate
In November 1597, the key issue that dominated parliamentary business was the abuse of monopolies. An MP named Francis Moore initiated a discussion about what he called "sundry enormities growing by patents of privilege and... the abuses of them." In simpler terms, he was raising concerns about the way monopoly licences were being granted and misused.
What Were Monopolies?
Monopolies were exclusive rights granted by the Crown to individuals or companies, allowing them sole control over the production or sale of certain goods. By 1597, these monopolies had become a source of significant resentment because:
- They raised prices for ordinary consumers
- They restricted trade and economic opportunity
- They were often granted to royal favourites as a way for Elizabeth to reward loyalty without spending money from the royal treasury
- Many people saw them as an abuse of the royal prerogative
The Commons' response
The debate among MPs revealed different views on how to tackle the monopolies problem. Some MPs wanted to introduce a parliamentary bill to deal with the issue directly. This would have been a much more aggressive approach, as it would have limited Elizabeth's royal prerogative - her exclusive right to grant monopolies.
However, other MPs recognised that challenging the queen's prerogative directly could provoke a serious constitutional confrontation. They were eventually persuaded to take a softer approach. Instead of a bill, the Commons agreed to present a petition to Elizabeth. This meant they were requesting that she take action, but not directly challenging her authority to grant monopolies in the first place.
A Careful Political Balance
This careful approach showed that while MPs were willing to criticise royal policies, they were still cautious about directly confronting the queen's prerogative powers. This distinction between voicing complaints and challenging royal authority was crucial to the political dynamics of the period.
Elizabeth's response
Elizabeth I demonstrated her political skill in managing this situation. She recognised the strength of feeling in the Commons and moved quickly to defuse tensions. The queen promised that all monopoly licences would be examined, suggesting that abuses would be identified and corrected.
This promise had the desired effect. The Commons, satisfied that their concerns had been heard and that action would be taken, dropped their immediate pressure on the monopolies issue.
Taxation
With the monopolies controversy apparently resolved, parliament turned to the main business for which it had been summoned: granting taxation to fund the government's expenses, particularly military costs.
Remarkably, the Commons agreed to pass a substantial grant of taxation with much less opposition than they had shown in 1593. This contrast is significant - it suggests that MPs were willing to support the Crown financially once their grievances had been addressed (or appeared to have been addressed).
Significance of the 1597 parliament
The 1597 parliament represented an important turning point in relations between Elizabeth and her MPs:
Three Key Developments
-
First direct criticism: This was the first parliament where MPs openly criticised Elizabeth's policies, specifically the abuse of monopolies. Earlier parliaments had raised concerns, but not with this level of directness.
-
No direct challenge to prerogative: Despite their criticism, MPs stopped short of challenging the royal prerogative itself. By choosing a petition rather than a bill, they acknowledged Elizabeth's right to grant monopolies, even while complaining about how that right was being exercised.
-
Successful management - temporarily: Elizabeth successfully defused what could have become a serious confrontation by making promises to address the Commons' concerns.
The broken promise and consequences
The resolution of the 1597 parliament appeared successful, and the situation might have been permanently resolved if Elizabeth had kept her promise. However, she took almost no action. Most patents granting monopolies were not cancelled, and even worse, new monopolies continued to be created.
Elizabeth's Broken Promise
Elizabeth's failure to honour her commitments had serious consequences. When she was forced to summon parliament again in 1601 to request more taxation, the Commons' resentment had grown far stronger. Their complaints, which had been "neutralised" by Elizabeth's promises in 1597, exploded into much more extreme anger by 1601. The simmering discontent had become outright fury.
The 1601 parliament would prove to be the most difficult of Elizabeth's reign, dominated by fierce attacks on monopolies and a more confrontational relationship between Crown and Commons. The roots of this crisis lay directly in Elizabeth's failure to honour the promises she had made in 1597.
Key Points to Remember
- The 1597 parliament saw the first direct criticism of Elizabeth's policies, focused on the abuse of monopolies (exclusive trading rights)
- MP Francis Moore initiated the debate about "patents of privilege" in November 1597, against a backdrop of war with Spain, Tyrone's rebellion in Ireland, and economic hardship
- MPs chose to present a petition rather than introduce a bill, avoiding a direct challenge to the royal prerogative while still voicing their complaints
- Elizabeth promised to examine all monopoly licences, which defused tensions and led to the Commons granting substantial taxation with little opposition
- However, Elizabeth broke her promise and did almost nothing to reform monopolies, setting the stage for a much more serious confrontation in the 1601 parliament