Themes (OCR A-Level English Literature): Revision Notes
Themes
Themes are the core ideas that run through a literary work. In Richard III, Shakespeare explores several fundamental themes that help us understand the play's deeper meanings and significance. These themes connect to broader human experiences and historical contexts, making the play relevant beyond its specific time period.
Understanding these themes is essential for analyzing the play's complexity. Each theme interconnects with others, creating a rich tapestry of meaning that goes beyond surface-level plot comprehension.
The attraction of evil
One of the most fascinating aspects of Richard III is how Shakespeare presents evil not as something to explain, but as something to observe in action. Richard claims his physical deformity drives his wicked behaviour, but this appears to be another example of his manipulation rather than a genuine explanation.
How evil operates
The play focuses on how Richard's evil mind works rather than why he became evil. We see his methods of manipulation, control and injury in detail. Richard demonstrates his cunning through:
- Clever wordplay and persuasive arguments
- Strategic deception of those around him
- Ruthless elimination of obstacles
- Manipulation of people's emotions and sympathies
Common Mistake: Students often try to explain or justify Richard's behaviour. Shakespeare deliberately avoids providing psychological explanations for Richard's evil. Instead, focus on analyzing how his evil operates and what this reveals about the nature of wickedness itself.
Complicity of victims
A crucial idea in the play is that Richard's victims play a role in their own downfall. They allow themselves to be taken in by his charisma and charm, even when warning signs are clear. Lady Anne provides the most striking example. Despite knowing Richard murdered her husband and father-in-law, she allows herself to be seduced by him and accepts his marriage proposal, even whilst acknowledging he will likely kill her too.
Dramatic Demonstration: Lady Anne's Seduction (Act 1, Scene 2)
Step 1: Richard interrupts Anne's funeral procession for her father-in-law
- She knows Richard killed both her husband and King Henry VI
- She curses him openly and calls him a "hedgehog" and "devil"
Step 2: Richard uses linguistic manipulation
- He claims he killed them out of love for her
- He offers her his sword and bares his chest, daring her to kill him
- He appeals to her vanity and emotions
Step 3: The shocking conclusion
- Despite her initial hatred, Anne accepts his ring
- She later admits: "I'll rest betide the chamber where thou liest"
- This demonstrates the dangerous power of charismatic evil
Other characters similarly overlook Richard's dishonesty and violent actions because they are drawn to his charismatic personality. This pattern of willing blindness enables Richard's rise to power.
The audience's relationship with Richard
Shakespeare creates an uncomfortable dynamic between Richard and the audience. Whilst we should be repulsed by his terrible actions, his entertaining monologues draw us in. When Richard shares his plans and thoughts directly with us, we become almost complicit in his schemes. His brilliant, gleeful speeches make us like him and even hope he succeeds, despite knowing his malice. This mirrors how the other characters fall under his spell, making us question our own susceptibility to charismatic evil.
Exam tip: When writing about this theme, consider how Shakespeare uses soliloquies to create audience sympathy for Richard, and what this suggests about the nature of evil and our response to it.
The link between ruler and state
As a history play, Richard III examines ideas about good governance and how a ruler's character affects the entire nation. Shakespeare explores the relationship between political leadership and national wellbeing through various scenes and perspectives.
Window scenes and common people
Shakespeare uses 'window scenes' to show how events in the royal palace affect ordinary people's lives. These scenes include:
- The conversation of common citizens in Act 2, Scene 3
- Buckingham's speech to the masses and Richard's acceptance of the crown in Act 3
- The Scrivener's scene in Act 3, Scene 4
These scenes provide glimpses into how political drama impacts those outside the palace walls. They serve as a moral barometer for the play's events.
Common people's wisdom
Significantly, ordinary people recognise Richard's dangerous nature long before the nobles do. Their fear and distrust of Richard proves well-founded, and their opposition becomes one of the main forces enabling Richmond to overthrow him. This suggests that common people may have clearer moral judgement than those blinded by proximity to power.
Key Political Insight: Shakespeare suggests that those furthest from power often see political reality most clearly. The nobles, caught up in court intrigue and personal ambition, fail to recognize the threat that ordinary citizens perceive immediately. This inverts traditional hierarchies of wisdom and judgement.
Ruler and state health
Shakespeare develops an important political theme: a ruler's moral character directly affects the state's wellbeing. This idea appears in other Shakespeare plays, particularly Hamlet and Macbeth. The principle works both ways:
- A morally righteous ruler leads to a flourishing state (like Denmark under King Hamlet)
- A corrupt or evil ruler causes the state to suffer (like Scotland under Macbeth)
In Richard III, we see England decline under Richard's tyrannical rule, with fear and instability spreading throughout the kingdom. His moral corruption poisons the entire political system.
The power of language
Language emerges as a secondary but fascinating theme in Richard III. For Richard, words function as his primary weapon for gaining and maintaining political power.
Language as Richard's weapon
Richard possesses extraordinary skill with words, which he uses to manipulate, confuse and control those around him. His linguistic abilities enable him to:
- Seduce Lady Anne through persuasive rhetoric
- Have Clarence imprisoned by twisting facts
- Keep the Woodvilles unaware of his true intentions
- Blame King Edward for Clarence's death
- Arrange Hastings's execution
All of these achievements come with minimal risk to himself because he accomplishes them through words rather than direct action.
Richard's mastery of language makes him a particularly dangerous villain. Unlike characters who rely on physical force or military power, Richard can destroy his enemies whilst maintaining apparent innocence and even sympathy. His words are weapons that leave no visible wounds.
Language as defence
Interestingly, language also appears to be the only effective defence against Richard. When the young princes match his skill at wordplay, they demonstrate their ability to see through his schemes. They show intelligence and awareness that threatens Richard's plans.
However, when characters use language to resist Richard successfully, he simply resorts to violence. He has the princes murdered when their wit proves they cannot be manipulated through words alone. This shows the ultimate limitation of language as a defence against a tyrant willing to use force.
Critical Analysis Point: The princes' deaths reveal a dark truth about power—when linguistic manipulation fails, those with military and political power can simply resort to violence. This suggests that language, whilst powerful, cannot ultimately protect the vulnerable from tyranny.
Exam tip: When analysing Richard's use of language, look for specific examples of rhetoric, persuasion and manipulation in his speeches. Consider how his facility with words contrasts with his claimed physical deformity.
The birth of the Tudor dynasty
Richard III dramatises a crucial turning point in English history: the end of the Wars of the Roses and the rise of the Tudor dynasty through Henry VII's victory. Understanding the historical context helps explain Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard.
Historical background
The Wars of the Roses were civil wars between rival branches of the royal family. Richard III's defeat at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485 marked their end and established the Tudor dynasty. The Tudors continued ruling England through Shakespeare's own time, with Queen Elizabeth I (a Tudor) on the throne when he wrote the play.
Historical Context: The Wars of the Roses (1455-1485) pitted the House of Lancaster (red rose) against the House of York (white rose). Richard III was the last Yorkist king. His defeat by Henry Tudor (who became Henry VII) united the two houses through Henry's marriage to Elizabeth of York, symbolically ending the conflict.
Shakespeare's political motivations
As a playwright in 16th-century England, Shakespeare needed to maintain favour with those in power, who could literally make or break his career. This political reality influenced his portrayal of Richard III in several ways:
- Richard appears as a vile, hateful villain to make Henry VII's victory seem more glorious
- The worse Richard appears, the better Henry looks for defeating him
- Presenting Henry positively made the play more acceptable to the Tudor monarchy
- Portraying Richard as heroic would have made Henry seem villainous for overthrowing him, potentially causing Shakespeare to fall from favour with Queen Elizabeth I
Critical Perspective: Modern historians suggest the real Richard III was likely far less villainous than Shakespeare portrays. Evidence indicates he was a capable administrator and not necessarily the murderous hunchback of the play. Shakespeare's portrayal serves Tudor propaganda rather than historical accuracy.
Historical drama versus propaganda
Whilst these political considerations influenced the play, they do not define it. Shakespeare's exploration of evil's psychology stands independently and transcends mere propaganda. The play offers genuine insights into human nature, power and morality that remain relevant regardless of its historical accuracy.
However, it remains important to recognise that the history Shakespeare presents was still politically sensitive when he wrote. His own time's considerations strongly affected how he portrayed past events. Richard III may have been less villainous in reality than Shakespeare depicts, but artistic and political necessity required this portrayal.
Exam tip: When discussing this theme, acknowledge both Shakespeare's artistic achievement and the political context that shaped his work. Consider how the play functions as both historical drama and Tudor propaganda.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The play examines how evil operates through Richard's manipulation, with victims complicit in their own downfall and audiences drawn to Richard despite his wickedness
-
A ruler's moral character directly affects the state's health, shown through the common people's wisdom in recognising Richard's danger before the nobles
-
Language serves as Richard's primary weapon for manipulation and control, though he resorts to violence when wordplay fails
-
Shakespeare portrays Richard negatively partly to glorify the Tudor dynasty and please Queen Elizabeth I, though the play's psychological insights transcend propaganda
-
All four themes interconnect, showing how personal morality, political power and linguistic skill combine to shape historical events