How effective were government and/or private responses to the Famine? (100) - Leaving Cert History - Question 1 - 2018

The British government introduced measures such as the Poor Law and relief works to assist the starving population. However, these measures were often inadequate and poorly executed. Initial reluctance to intervene at a large scale resulted in massive mortality and emigration. The use of public works, for example, often led to exploitation of labor and provided minimal relief.

Private organizations and charities played a crucial role in providing aid. For instance, the efforts of the Quakers and local relief committees were notable for their effectiveness, as they delivered food and resources directly to affected areas, often more swiftly than government initiatives.

When comparing government to private responses, it becomes evident that local and private efforts were generally more effective in alleviating immediate suffering. Government actions, bogged down by bureaucracy and reluctance to accept the severity of the crisis, were far less responsive to the urgent needs of the population.

In conclusion, while both government and private responses were present, the latter proved to be more effective in addressing the immediate impact of the Famine. The inadequacies of governmental efforts highlight the need for a more proactive and compassionate approach in times of crisis.